Axton v. DST Systems, Inc.
| Matthew Axton |
| DST Systems, Inc., Megan M Egli and Ann M Songer |
| 4:2021cv09029 |
| August 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Nanette K Laughrey |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. § 1 |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Theresa Hursh against DST Systems, Inc.; in favor of Jason Hamilton against DST Systems, Inc.; in favor of John Oswald against DST Systems, Inc.; in favor of Stephanie McMillin against DST Systems, Inc.; in favor of Melody Miser against DST Systems, Inc.; in favor of Travis Schulte against DST Systems, Inc; in favor of Angie Manske against DST Systems, Inc; in favor of Katherine Gillespie against DST Systems, Inc.; in favor of Fred Quatrocky against DST Systems, Inc; in favor of Kent Clower against DST Systems, Inc.; in favor of Matthew Axton against DST Systems, Inc.; in favor of Gary Blanck against DST Systems, Inc.; in favor of Bernard Billesbach against DST Systems, Inc.; in favor of Lisa Kudrick against DST Systems, Inc.; in favor of Percy Payne against DST Systems, Inc.; in favor of Janet Kannard against DST Systems, Inc.; in favor of Vanessa Bross against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Patrick Williams against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Scott Yungeberg against DST Systems Inc (Houston, Kiambu) |
| Filing 13 ***Remark - This case has been converted to a civil case. The case type has been changed to "cv" with the case number remaining the same. Please update your records to reflect this change. All documents should be filed in the civil case. This is a text entry only. No document is attached (Jones, Robin) |
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. The Court grants leave to Plaintiff to exceed by 20 pages the page limit for the reply in support of the motion to confirm the arbitration award. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Sreeprakash, Netra)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER by Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. Plaintiff's motion (Doc. #1 ) for confirmation of the arbitration award is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in the specified amount in Plaintiff's favor against DST. (Sreeprakash, Netra)
|
| Filing 10 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #1 MOTION for order Confirming Arbitration Award filed by Andrew Schermerhorn on behalf of Plaintiff Matthew Axton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O)(Related document(s) #1 ) (Schermerhorn, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #1 MOTION for order Confirming Arbitration Award filed by Robert T. Adams on behalf of Defendant DST Systems, Inc.. Reply suggestions due by 9/29/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(Related document(s) #1 ) (Adams, Robert) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC TRANSCRIPT of Teleconference held 9/8/2021 before Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. Court Reporter: Katie Wirt, 816-512-5608, katie_wirt@mow.uscourts.gov. Number of pages: 25. NOTICE RE: REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: Within 7 calendar days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Redaction, of the parties' intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy is located on our website at www.mow.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. NOTICE: Attorneys must contact the court reporter for copies during this 90 day period. If necessary, Notice of Intent to Redact is due by 9/17/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 12/9/2021. NOTICE: Attorneys must contact the court reporter for copies during this 90 day period. (Wirt, Katie) |
| Filing 7 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey: TELEPHONE CONFERENCE held on 9/8/2021. Counsel appearing for Plaintiff(s): Andrew Schermerhorn, George Kapke, Jr. William Carr, Kenneth Klamann. Counsel appearing for Defendant(s): Lewis Clayton, Robert Adams, Jeffrey Recher. Time in court: 1:04 p.m. to 1:46 p.m. To order a transcript of this hearing please contact Katie Wirt, 816-512-5608, katie_wirt@mow.uscourts.gov. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. Proceedings: Counsel presented argument as to the pending Motion for Extension of Time to Respond (Doc. #3 ). The Court extended the briefing schedule as to the Motion for Order Confirming Arbitration Award (Doc. #1 ) as follows: Defendants Response/Suggestions in Opposition due September 15, 2021; Plaintiffs Reply Suggestions due seven (7) days after Defendants briefing is filed. Defendants unopposed request for enlargement by five pages of the page limit for its response to the motion to confirm arbitration award also is GRANTED. (Anderson, Christy) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. Briefing on the motion to confirm arbitration award is stayed pending the teleconference concerning Defendant's motion for extension of time to respond, which is scheduled for September 8, 2021. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Sreeprakash, Netra)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER entered by Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. A Telephone Conference is set for 9/8/2021 at 1:00 PM before District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey regarding the motion for extension of time to respond to the pending motions to confirm arbitration awards. The parties shall call conference number 877-336-1828, access code: 8503666 to participate. Signed on 09/03/2021 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Lock, Tania)
|
| Filing 4 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #3 MOTION for extension of time to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award and for Enlargement of Page Limit for Response to Plaintiff's Motion filed by Andrew Schermerhorn on behalf of Plaintiff Matthew Axton. Reply suggestions due by 9/15/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(Related document(s) #3 ) (Schermerhorn, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for extension of time to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award and for Enlargement of Page Limit for Response to Plaintiff's Motion filed by Megan Egli on behalf of All Defendants. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/15/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A Ferguson Order)(Attorney Megan Egli added to party DST Systems, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Megan Egli added to party Megan M Egli(pty:dft), Attorney Megan Egli added to party Ann M Songer(pty:dft))(Egli, Megan) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of counsel re #1 MOTION for order Confirming Arbitration Award by Andrew Schermerhorn on behalf of Matthew Axton (Schermerhorn, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for order Confirming Arbitration Award filed by Andrew Schermerhorn on behalf of Matthew Axton. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/7/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schermerhorn, Andrew) |
| MISCELLANEOUS CASE INITIATED by Andrew Schermerhorn on behalf of Matthew Axton. See motion immediately following this entry for details. This is a text entry only. No document is attached. Filing fee $49, receipt number AMOWDC-7546707. (Schermerhorn, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
