Conklin v. DST Systems Inc
Robert Conklin |
DST Systems Inc |
4:2021cv09181 |
November 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Nanette K Laughrey |
Other Statutes: Arbitration |
09 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Kevin Bostick against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Sarah Murphy against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Melanie Dillon against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Ryan Magathan against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Alice Wright against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Brad McMillin against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Alicia Costanzo against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Thomas Kane against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Jacqueline Davis against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Greg Bedell against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Dave Lovetere against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Karen Mustain against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Josh Rhodes against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Harry Crocker against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Lynn Sarowski against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Roger Poynter against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Thomas Edlund against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Michael Gillespie against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Patrick Lawless against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Debbie Kallenberger against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Robert Conklin against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Leanne Trimble against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Michael Giro against DST Systems Inc; in favor of Tracy Prince against DST Systems Inc (Houston, Kiambu) |
Filing 13 ORDER by Judge Nanette K. Laughrey GRANTING the motions to confirm arbitration awards ((1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09133-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09153-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09162-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09163-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09164-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09165-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09166-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09167-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09168-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09169-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09170-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09171-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09172-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09173-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09174-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09175-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09176-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09177-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09178-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09179-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09180-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09181-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09182-NKL; (1) motion in case 4:21-cv-09184-NKL) (Sreeprakash, Netra) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ENTRY: Teleconference held before the Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey on November 19, 2021, regarding Defendant's request to stay the proceedings. The Court ordered Defendant to respond to the motions for confirmation of arbitration awards by the deadlines as required under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court took Defendant's motion for a stay under advisement. Counsel for Plaintiff's: JNan Kimak, John Soper, Chelsea Pierce, Andrew Schermerhorn, John Klamann, Kenneth McClain, William Carr and George Kapke, Jr. Counsel for Defendant: Megan Egli, Robert Adams, Jeff Recher and Lewis Clayton. Court Reporter: Kathy Calvert. Courtroom Deputy: Tania Lock. Time in Court: 4:00 p.m. 4:12 p.m. To order a transcript of this hearing please contact Kathy Calvert, 816-512-5741, kathy_calvert@mow.uscourts.gov. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Lock, Tania) |
Filing 11 ORDER entered by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. A Telephone Conference is set for 11/19/2021 at 4:00 PM. The parties shall call conference number 877-336-1828, access code: 8503666 to participate. Signed on 11/19/2021 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Lock, Tania) |
Filing 10 ORDER entered by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. A Telephone Conference is set for 11/19/2021 at 4:00 PM. The parties shall call conference number 877-336-1828, access code: 8503666 to participate. Signed on 11/19/2021 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Lock, Tania) |
Filing 9 ***Remark - This case has been converted to a civil case. The case type has been changed to "cv" with the case number remaining the same. Please update your records to reflect this change. All documents should be filed in the civil case. This is a text entry only. No document is attached. (Matthes Mitra, Renea) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of filing Letter by DST Systems Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Adams, Robert) |
Filing 7 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #1 MOTION for order Confirmation of Arbitration Award Against DST filed by Andrew Schermerhorn on behalf of Plaintiff Robert Conklin. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Schermerhorn, Andrew) |
Filing 6 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #1 MOTION for order Confirmation of Arbitration Award Against DST filed by Robert T. Adams on behalf of Defendant DST Systems Inc. Reply suggestions due by 11/30/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I)(Related document(s) #1 ) (Adams, Robert) |
Filing 5 ORDER by Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. Defendant's motion for leave to exceed by five pages the 15-page limit for suggestions in opposition to the motion to confirm arbitration award (Doc. #1 ) is GRANTED. Defendant's response to the motion to confirm arbitration award may comprise up to 20 pages. Further, the Court grants leave to Plaintiff to exceed by 20 pages the page limit for any reply in support of the motion to confirm the arbitration award. Signed on 11/11/2021 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Vandegriff, Joseph) |
Filing 4 MOTION for leave to file excess pages in Its Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award filed by Megan Egli on behalf of DST Systems Inc. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/24/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attorney Megan Egli added to party DST Systems Inc(pty:dft))(Egli, Megan) |
Filing 3 ORDER TRANSFERRING/REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey for all further proceedings. District Judge Roseann Ketchmark no longer assigned to case. Signed on 11/2/2021 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Skelton, Sara) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of counsel Notice of Motion and Deadline to Respond by George E. Kapke, Jr on behalf of Robert Conklin (Kapke, George) |
Filing 1 MOTION for order Confirmation of Arbitration Award Against DST filed by George E. Kapke, Jr on behalf of Robert Conklin. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/16/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A Conklin Award, #2 Exhibit Ex. B Conklin Arbitration Agreement, #3 Exhibit Ex. C. Plan Arbitration Agreement, #4 Exhibit Ex. D Ducharme Reply, #5 Exhibit Ex. E. Ducharme Sur Reply, #6 Exhibit Ex. F. Notice of Right to Assert Claim, #7 Exhibit Ex. G. Parrott Order, #8 Exhibit Ex. H. Joint Submission, #9 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Kapke, George) |
MISCELLANEOUS CASE INITIATED by George E. Kapke, Jr on behalf of Robert Conklin. See motion immediately following this entry for details. This is a text entry only. No document is attached. Filing fee $49, receipt number AMOWDC-7652898. (Kapke, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.