Wright v. DST Systems, Inc.
Alice Wright |
DST Systems, Inc. |
4:2021mc00064 |
February 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Howard F Sachs |
Brian C Wimes |
Other Statutes: Arbitration |
27 U.S.C. ยง 185 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 6 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #4 MOTION to dismiss party DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS ACTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD, #1 MOTION for order Confirm Arbitration Award filed by Andrew Schermerhorn on behalf of Plaintiff Alice Wright. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Related document(s) #4 , #1 ) (Schermerhorn, Andrew) |
Filing 5 SUGGESTIONS in support re #4 MOTION to dismiss party DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS ACTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD filed by Robert T. Adams on behalf of Defendant DST Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Related document(s) #4 ) (Adams, Robert) |
Filing 4 MOTION to dismiss party DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS ACTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD filed by Robert T. Adams on behalf of DST Systems, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/3/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Adams, Robert) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of counsel re #1 MOTION for order Confirm Arbitration Award by Andrew Schermerhorn on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Schermerhorn, Andrew) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF CORRECTION - This case was incorrectly opened as a civil case. The case has been changed to a miscellaneous case and reassigned from the correct deck. The case has been assigned to the Honorable Howard F. Sachs. Please note the new case number: 4:21-00064-MC-W-HFS. (Jones, Robin) |
Filing 1 MOTION for order Confirm Arbitration Award filed by Andrew Schermerhorn on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/17/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Schermerhorn, Andrew) Modified on 2/3/2021 at the request of counsel to add civil cover sheet. NEF regenerated. (Kern, Kendra) |
MISCELLANEOUS CASE INITIATED by Andrew Schermerhorn on behalf of Alice Wright. See motion immediately following this entry for details. This is a text entry only. No document is attached. Filing fee $49, receipt number AMOWDC-7266251.(Schermerhorn, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wright v. DST Systems, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Alice Wright | |
Represented By: | Andrew Schermerhorn |
Represented By: | John M. Klamann |
Represented By: | Kenneth B. McClain |
Represented By: | George E. Kapke, Jr. |
Represented By: | William L Carr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DST Systems, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Robert T. Adams |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.