Chen v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Plaintiff: Lijuan Chen
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and AG Merrick Garland
Case Number: 4:2022cv00040
Filed: January 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Stephen R Bough
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 17, 2022 Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Lijuan Chen. United States Attorney served on 1/31/2022. Answer due 4/1/2022. (Lenhert, Amy) Modified on 2/22/2022 to correct docket entry (Houston, Kiambu).
January 26, 2022 SUMMONS REISSUED (to correct clerical error) as to Merrick Garland. (Woods, Gloria)
January 25, 2022 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Merrick Garland. (Woods, Gloria)
January 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Amy C. Lenhert for Lijuan Chen allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Berner, Crystal)
January 20, 2022 Filing 2 Motion to allow Amy Lenhert to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7764903) filed by William Michael Sharma-Crawford on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Sharma-Crawford, William) (Main Document 2 replaced on 1/20/2022) (Berner, Crystal).
January 20, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by William Michael Sharma-Crawford on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7764831. Service due by 4/20/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil coversheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Sharma-Crawford, William)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chen v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lijuan Chen
Represented By: Amy C Lenhert
Represented By: William Michael Sharma-Crawford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AG Merrick Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?