Anderson v. Brewer
Petitioner: David Anderson
Respondent: Chris Brewer
Case Number: 4:2022cv00057
Filed: January 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Gary A Fenner
Referring Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2022 Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED that this case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Orders. Any motion to reopen this case must be filed within a reasonable time, and must be accompanied by Petitioner's reply, as previously ordered. (Davies, Cindy)
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: ORDERED that this case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Orders. Any motion to reopen this case must be filed within a reasonable time, and must be accompanied by Petitioner's reply, as previously ordered. Signed on March 21, 2022 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (Davies, Cindy)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that Petitioner shall file a reply to Respondent's response (Doc. #4 ) on or before March 15, 2022. Petitioner's failure to file a timely reply will result in dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 2/22/2022 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Doty, Greg)
February 22, 2022 Filing 4 RESPONSE to order re 2 Order to Show Cause, filed by Patrick Logan on behalf of Respondent Chris Brewer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (DA Brief), #2 Exhibit B (State's DA Brief), #3 Exhibit C (DA Reply Brief), #4 Exhibit D (DA Opinion), #5 Exhibit E (DA Legal File), #6 Exhibit F (PCR Brief), #7 Exhibit G (State's PCR Brief), #8 Exhibit H (PCR Opinion), #9 Exhibit I (PCR Transcript), #10 Exhibit J (Trial Transcript), #11 Exhibit K (Sentencing Transcript), #12 Exhibit L (PCR Mandate))(Related document(s) 2 ) (Logan, Patrick)
January 28, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of appearance by Patrick Logan on behalf of Chris Brewer (Attorney Patrick Logan added to party Chris Brewer(pty:res))(Logan, Patrick)
January 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) Respondent answer Petitioner's allegations and show cause on or before February 25, 2022, why the relief Petitioner seeks should not be granted. Signed on January 26, 2022 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
January 26, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by David Anderson.(Davies, Cindy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. Brewer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Chris Brewer
Represented By: Patrick Logan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?