Rhymer v. Buckner
Petitioner: James N Rhymer
Respondent: Michele Buckner
Case Number: 4:2022cv00106
Filed: February 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Roseann Ketchmark
Referring Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER that Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. #6 ) is granted. Petitioner shall file a reply in support of his motion on or before May 25, 2022. Failure to timely reply will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on April 11, 2022 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
April 11, 2022 Filing 6 PETITIONER'S MOTION for extension of time to file reply to Doc. #4 filed by James N Rhymer. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/25/2022. (Davies, Cindy)
March 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that: Petitioner file a reply in support of his motion on or before April 25, 2022. Petitioner's failure to file a timely reply may result in dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 3/23/2022 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Willis, Kathy)
March 23, 2022 Filing 4 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Michele Buckner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (trial transcript), #2 Exhibit B (direct appeal legal file), #3 Exhibit C (direct appeal appellant's brief), #4 Exhibit D (direct appeal respondents brief), #5 Exhibit E (direct appeal reply brief), #6 Exhibit F (direct appeal opinion), #7 Exhibit G (post-conviction hearing transcript), #8 Exhibit H (post-conviction legal file excerpts), #9 Exhibit I (post-conviction appellant's brief), #10 Exhibit J (post-conviction respondent's brief), #11 Exhibit K (post-conviction reply brief), #12 Exhibit L (post-conviction memorandum decision))(Crane, Andrew)
March 10, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of appearance by Andrew J Crane on behalf of Michele Buckner (Attorney Andrew J Crane added to party Michele Buckner(pty:res))(Crane, Andrew)
February 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) Respondent answer Petitioner's allegations and show cause on or before March 23, 2022, why the relief Petitioner seeks should not be granted. Signed on February 23, 2022 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
February 23, 2022 RECEIPT number KCMO094027 in the amount of $5.00 issued to James Rhymer. (Woods, Gloria)
February 22, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James N Rhymer. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Davies, Cindy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rhymer v. Buckner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James N Rhymer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michele Buckner
Represented By: Andrew J Crane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?