Warren v. Portnoy et al
Plaintiff: Willie Warren
Defendant: Daniel Francis Portnoy, Kenneth R. Garrett and Jeffrey Gedbaw
Case Number: 4:2022cv00120
Filed: February 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Fernando J Gaitan
Referring Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2022 Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: This case is summarily dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. (Willis, Kathy)
March 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that: This case is summarily dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. It is further ORDERED that the agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward to the Clerk of the Court monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the $350 filing fee is paid. Signed on 3/16/2022 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (CLERK'S NOTE: Collect filing fee letter mailed to MO DOC Finance Office with copy of 3/16/2022 Order as directed.) (Willis, Kathy)
March 7, 2022 RECEIPT number KCMO094242 in the amount of $85.00 issued to Missouri Department of Corrections on behalf of Willie Warren. (Woods, Gloria)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that: (1) Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Missouri, an initial partial filing fee of $84.58; (3) Plaintiff's failure to pay the required initial partial filing fee on or before March 11, 2022, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 2/25/2022 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Willis, Kathy)
February 24, 2022 Filing 3 INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Willie Warren. (Willis, Kathy)
February 24, 2022 Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Willie Warren. (Willis, Kathy)
February 24, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Willie Warren. (Attachment: #1 Complaint Exhibits)(Willis, Kathy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Warren v. Portnoy et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willie Warren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Francis Portnoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth R. Garrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey Gedbaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?