Russell v. Liberty Fruit Company, Inc.
Woodie Russell |
Liberty Fruit Company, Inc. |
4:2022cv00176 |
March 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Stephen R Bough |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Liberty Fruit Company, Inc. Initial Rule 26 Disclosures filed by Gregory P Goheen on behalf of Defendant Liberty Fruit Company, Inc..(Goheen, Gregory) |
Filing 25 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES and Identified Documents filed by Robert A Bruce on behalf of Plaintiff Woodie Russell.(Bruce, Robert) |
Filing 24 REPORT of Rule 26(f) planning meeting. (Bruce, Robert) |
Filing 23 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #17 MOTION to strike #15 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Gregory P Goheen on behalf of Defendant Liberty Fruit Company, Inc.. Reply suggestions due by 5/17/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #17 ) (Goheen, Gregory) |
Filing 22 ANSWER to Complaint on behalf of Liberty Fruit Company, Inc..(Goheen, Gregory) |
Filing 21 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #15 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Robert A Bruce on behalf of Plaintiff Woodie Russell. Reply suggestions due by 5/16/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Kan. Pattern Instru. 124.56)(Related document(s) #15 ) (Bruce, Robert) |
Filing 20 Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion to Stay Briefing on Defendants Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. #19.) Upon review, the motion is DENIED. Plaintiffs response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss was due yesterday, April 27, 2022, and no response has been filed. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss on or before May 2, 2022. Signed on 4/28/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Crocker, Susan) |
Filing 19 MOTION to stay re #15 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Briefing until Resolution of Motion to Strike filed by Robert A Bruce on behalf of Woodie Russell. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/10/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #15 ) (Bruce, Robert) |
Filing 18 SUGGESTIONS in support re #17 MOTION to strike #15 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Robert A Bruce on behalf of Plaintiff Woodie Russell. (Related document(s) #17 ) (Bruce, Robert) |
Filing 17 MOTION to strike #15 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Robert A Bruce on behalf of Woodie Russell. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/3/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #15 ) (Bruce, Robert) |
Filing 16 SUGGESTIONS in support re #15 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Gregory P Goheen on behalf of Defendant Liberty Fruit Company, Inc.. (Related document(s) #15 ) (Goheen, Gregory) |
Filing 15 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Gregory P Goheen on behalf of Liberty Fruit Company, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/27/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Goheen, Gregory) |
Filing 14 Before the Court is Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead. (Doc. #12.) For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall file its answer or other responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before April 13, 2022. Signed on 4/13/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Richard, Tracey) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE to motion re #12 MOTION for extension of time to file answer or otherwise plead Consenting to the Motion filed by Robert A Bruce on behalf of Plaintiff Woodie Russell. Reply suggestions due by 4/27/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Bruce, Robert) |
Filing 12 MOTION for extension of time to file answer or otherwise plead filed by Gregory P Goheen on behalf of Liberty Fruit Company, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/26/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Goheen, Gregory) |
Filing 11 ORDER denying #3 motion to change venue. Signed on 3/29/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Richard, Tracey) Modified on 3/29/2022 to reflect the motion was denied, NEF regenerated. (Richard, Tracey). |
Filing 10 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #3 MOTION to change venue filed by Gregory P Goheen on behalf of Defendant Liberty Fruit Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2)(Related document(s) #3 ) (Goheen, Gregory) |
Filing 9 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Gregory P Goheen on behalf of Defendant Liberty Fruit Company, Inc..(Goheen, Gregory) |
Filing 8 RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 5/6/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 5/16/2022 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 7B, Kansas City (SRB) before District Judge Stephen R. Bough. Signed on 3/18/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Richard, Tracey) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of filing Submission of Pleadings from State Court Action by Liberty Fruit Company, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Pleadings)(Goheen, Gregory) |
Filing 6 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #3 MOTION to change venue filed by Robert A Bruce on behalf of Plaintiff Woodie Russell. Reply suggestions due by 3/28/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Distance between Courts)(Related document(s) #3 ) (Bruce, Robert) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to Program Director. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 4 SUGGESTIONS in support re #3 MOTION to change venue filed by Gregory P Goheen on behalf of Defendant Liberty Fruit Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Related document(s) #3 ) (Goheen, Gregory) |
Filing 3 MOTION to change venue filed by Gregory P Goheen on behalf of Liberty Fruit Company, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/28/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Goheen, Gregory) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of filing Notice of Removal by Liberty Fruit Company, Inc. (Goheen, Gregory) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County County, case number 2216-CV02291, filed by Gregory P Goheen. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7842950. (Attachments: #1 State Court Petition, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goheen, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Russell v. Liberty Fruit Company, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Woodie Russell | |
Represented By: | Daniel L Doyle |
Represented By: | Robert A Bruce |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Liberty Fruit Company, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Gregory P Goheen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.