Zhou v. Bitter et al
Ling Bing Zhou |
Rena Bitter, Anthony John Blinken, Merrick Garland, Ur M Jaddou, Honorable Alejandro Mayorkas and Antony John Blinken |
4:2022cv00185 |
March 17, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Fernando J Gaitan |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Theodore N. Cox for Ling Bing Zhou allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Warren, Melissa) |
Filing 2 Motion to allow Theodore Cox to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7864791) filed by William Michael Sharma-Crawford on behalf of Ling Bing Zhou. (Sharma-Crawford, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.