Brayfield v. The Bureaus, Inc. et al
| James G. Brayfield, Jr. |
| The Bureaus, Inc. and Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC |
| 4:2022cv00272 |
| April 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Brian C Wimes |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by James G. Brayfield, Jr (Philipps, David) |
Filing 10
ORDERED this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice. In the event that the settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days of the date of this Order. In addition, the Court retains jurisdiction over enforcement of the settlement agreed to by the parties. Signed on 5/17/22 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Diefenbach, Tracy)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of settlement by James G. Brayfield, Jr (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by James G. Brayfield, Jr. The Bureaus, Inc. served on 4/28/2022, answer due 5/19/2022. (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by James G. Brayfield, Jr. (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by James G. Brayfield, Jr. Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC served on 4/28/2022, answer due 5/19/2022. (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Kern, Kendra) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 and #3 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Mary E. Philipps and David J. Philipps for James G. Brayfield, Jr allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Warren, Melissa)
|
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC, The Bureaus, Inc.. (Kern, Kendra) |
| Filing 3 Motion to allow David J. Philipps to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7904624) filed by James Crump on behalf of James G. Brayfield, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Movant David J. Philipps)(Crump, James) |
| Filing 2 Motion to allow Mary E. Philipps to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7904623) filed by James Crump on behalf of James G. Brayfield, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Movant Mary E. Philipps)(Crump, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC, The Bureaus, Inc. filed by James Crump on behalf of James G. Brayfield, Jr. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7904618. Service due by 7/25/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Crump, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
