Fisher v. Javois
George W Fisher |
Laurent Javois |
4:2022cv00322 |
May 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Nanette K Laughrey |
Prisoner Pro Se |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MANDATE of US COURT OF APPEALS as to #6 Notice of Appeal filed by George W Fisher with mandate issued on 7/13/2022. In accordance with the judgment of June 15, 2022, and pursuant to the provisions of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 41(a), the formal mandate is hereby issued in the above-styled matter. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 14 USCA Judgment as to #6 Notice of Appeal filed by George W Fisher This is a preliminary judgment and/or opinion of U.S. Court of Appeals; jurisdiction is not recovered until the Mandate is issued by the U.S Court of Appeals. The court has carefully reviewed the original file of the United States District Court and orders that this appeal be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is denied as moot.(Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 13 ORDER of US COURT OF APPEALS: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, CDs, videos, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. (CLERK'S NOTE: All documents pertaining to this case are on CM/ECF. Nothing will be sent to the Court of Appeals.) (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 12 ORDER of US COURT OF APPEALS: The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 07/05/2022, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 11 USCA Case Number from 8th Circuit is 22-2200 for #6 Notice of Appeal filed by George W Fisher.(Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 10 TRANSMISSION of Notice of Appeal Supplement to US Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit via electronic mail. Related document #6 Notice of Appeal. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 9 ORDER that the Court declines to issue certificates of appealability and denies Petitioner leave to proceed as a pauper on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) (appeal may not be taken as a pauper if Court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith). The Clerk of the Court shall send these cases to the Court of Appeals. Signed on 6/7/2022 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: This habeas corpus case is dismissed as duplicative of Fisher v. Javois, No. 22-0310-CV-W-NKL-P, now pending before the Court. Petitioner shouldpresent all known grounds for habeas corpus relief in Fisher, No. 22-0310. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 4 ORDER that this habeas corpus case is dismissed as duplicative of Fisher v. Javois, No. 22-0310-CV-W-NKL-P, which is now pending before the Court. Petitioner should present all known grounds for habeas corpus relief in Fisher, No. 22-0310. Signed on 6/3/2022 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 8 INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by George W Fisher. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 7 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by George W Fisher. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL filed by George W Fisher. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Appeal Supplement)(Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 3 ORDER that Petitioner file a statement in which he explains why the claims he makes this case have not or cannot be presented in Fisher v. Javois, Case No. 22-0310-CV-W-NKL-P, which is now pending before the Court. Petitioner shall file this statement no later than May 31, 2022. Signed on May 17, 2022, by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (McCoy, Mike) |
Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by George W Fisher. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by George W Fisher. (#1 2254 Attachments)(Willis, Kathy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Fisher v. Javois | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: George W Fisher | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Laurent Javois | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.