Falling Prices, Inc. v. Falling Prices, LLC
FALLING PRICES, INC. |
FALLING PRICES, LLC and Does 1-10 |
4:2022cv00380 |
June 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Gary A Fenner |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Falling Prices, LLC. (Mitchell, Lisa) |
Filing 9 MOTION for entry of clerk's judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55 filed by Jacob Newton Reinig on behalf of Falling Prices, Inc. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/26/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Brian M Wheeler in Support of Request to Enter Default)(Reinig, Jacob) Modified on 7/13/2022 to correct docket event per chamber's request (Crocker, Susan). |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #6 and #7 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Brian M. Wheeler and Joseph K. Lee for Falling Prices, Inc. allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Warren, Melissa) |
Filing 7 Motion to allow Joseph K. Lee to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7972348) filed by Jacob Newton Reinig on behalf of Falling Prices, Inc.. (Reinig, Jacob) |
Filing 6 Motion to allow Brian M. Wheeler to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7972334) filed by Jacob Newton Reinig on behalf of Falling Prices, Inc.. (Reinig, Jacob) |
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Falling Prices, Inc.. Falling Prices, LLC served on 6/7/2022, answer due 6/28/2022. (Simon, Jeffrey) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 3 Report on the filing of an action regarding trademark number(s) 5,790,049 and 5,790,038. Plaintiff(s): Falling Prices, INC. Lead Attorney for Plaintiff(s): Jacob Newton Reinig Husch Blackwell LLP - KCMO 4801 Main Street Suite 1000 Kansas City, MO 64112-2551 816-983-8000 Fax: 816-983-8080 Email: jake.reinig@huschblackwell.com Defendant(s): Falling Prices, LLC The civil complaint is attached. (Attachments: #1 AO 120 Form) (Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Jacob Newton Reinig on behalf of Plaintiff FALLING PRICES, INC..(Reinig, Jacob) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against FALLING PRICES, LLC filed by Jacob Newton Reinig on behalf of FALLING PRICES, INC.. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7964361. Service due by 9/6/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 AO 120 Report on the Filing or Determination of An Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reinig, Jacob) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.