Rhodes v. 3M Company et al
| Charles Rhodes |
| 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation, Archroma U.S. Inc., Arkema, Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Carrier Global Corporation, ChemDesign Products, Inc., Chemguard, Inc., Chemicals, Inc., Chemours Company FC, LLC, Chubb Fire, Ltd., Clariant Corporation, Corteva, Inc., Deepwater Chemicals, Inc., Du Pont de Nemours Inc., Dynax Corporation, E. I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company, Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Kidde P.L.C., Nation Ford Chemical Company, National Foam, Inc., The Chemours Company, Tyco Fire Products LP, United Technologies Corporation, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, DowDuPont Inc. and GE Interlogix, Inc. |
| 4:2022cv00491 |
| July 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Greg Kays |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MDL CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER, CTO-100, from John W. Nichols, Clerk of the Panel, transferring case to District of South Carolina to be included in MDL No. 2873. Signed on 8/15/2022. Case electronically transferred. (Ellis, Lindsey) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed on 8/5/22 by District Judge Greg Kays. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Law Clerk)
|
| Filing 8 Joint MOTION for extension of time to file answer filed by Kara T Stubbs on behalf of Chemguard, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/18/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Stubbs, Kara) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER. The parties' stipulation #6 is STRUCK. The parties are not able to stipulate to their own deadline to file an answer. The parties are nonetheless free to file a motion to stay pending a decision by the MDL. Signed on 8/4/22 by District Judge Greg Kays. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Law Clerk)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer by Chemguard, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP. (Stubbs, Kara) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.9 and with the consent of District Judge Greg Kays, this case is hereby transferred to District Judge Kays for all further proceedings. Signed on 7/29/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Richard, Tracey)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County, case number 2216-CV13892, filed by Kara T Stubbs. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-8037433. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court File)(Stubbs, Kara) Modified on 7/29/2022 to correct filing date. (Moore, Terri). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of filing of Notice of Removal by Chemguard, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court File)(Stubbs, Kara) |
| Filing 1 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Kara T Stubbs on behalf of Defendant Chemguard, Inc..(Attorney Kara T Stubbs added to party Chemguard, Inc.(pty:dft))(Stubbs, Kara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
