Mitchell v. Raytown Water et al
Blondell F. Mitchell |
Raytown Water, Raytown Water Board of Directors, Neil Clevenger, Missouri Public Service Commission, Travis Pringles, Keith Majors, Unknown Employees of the Missouri Public Service Commission, Missouri Office of Public Counsel and Unknown Employees of Public Counsel |
4:2022cv00511 |
August 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Greg Kays |
Labor: Fair Standards |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
RECEIPT number KCMO096807 in the amount of $402.00 issued to Blondell F Mitchell. (Kern, Kendra) |
Filing 4 ***Remark A copy of order and docket sheet mailed via regular mail to: Blondell F. Mitchell 5918 Agnes Ave. Kansas City, MO 64130. (Kern, Kendra) |
Filing 3 ORDER denying #1 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has two weeks from the date of this Order to pay the filing fee, or this case will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed on 8/23/22 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Law Clerk) |
Filing 2 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Blondell F. Mitchell. (Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 1 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Blondell F. Mitchell. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/19/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope)(Woods, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.