Simpson v. Cloverleaf Apartments Investors, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Dorothy Simpson
Defendant: Cloverleaf Apartments Investors, LLC, Stonebridge Global Partners, LLC and Seldin Company
Case Number: 4:2022cv00520
Filed: August 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Beth Phillips
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2022 Filing 30 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #20 Amended MOTION to remand and Suggestions in Support filed by Gregory A. Leyh on behalf of Plaintiff Dorothy Simpson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Related document(s) #20 ) (Leyh, Gregory)
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER granting #28 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. The reply suggestions regarding her Amended Motion to Remand, (Doc. 20), may exceed ten pages but cannot be more than 15 pages. Signed on 9/30/2022 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Guy, Alec)
September 29, 2022 Filing 28 MOTION for leave to file Excess Pages (Unopposed) filed by Gregory A. Leyh on behalf of Dorothy Simpson. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/13/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Leyh, Gregory)
September 28, 2022 NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP)
September 27, 2022 Filing 27 NOTICE (SEALED) by Stonebridge Global Partners, LLC re #23 Suggestions in Opposition to Motion,,, Exhibit B - Second Declaration of Eli J. Mizrahie (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8)(Olthoff, Mark)
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER. RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 11/10/2022. Rule 26 conference due by 10/27/2022. Signed on 9/26/22 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Cordell, Annette)
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER granting #24 Defendants' Joint Motion for Leave to File Exhibits Under Seal. Defendants are directed to file the Second Declaration of Eli J. Mizrahie and supporting financial documents under seal by September 29, 2022. Signed on 9/26/2022 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Guy, Alec)
September 23, 2022 Filing 24 MOTION for order Defendants' Joint Motion for Leave to File Exhibits Under Seal re #23 Suggestions in Opposition to Motion,,, filed by Mark A. Olthoff on behalf of Stonebridge Global Partners, LLC. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/7/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #23 ) (Olthoff, Mark)
September 23, 2022 Filing 23 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #20 Amended MOTION to remand and Suggestions in Support DEFENDANTS' JOINT SUGGESTIONS IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED MOTION TO REMAND filed by Mark A. Olthoff on behalf of Defendant Stonebridge Global Partners, LLC. Reply suggestions due by 10/7/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of James P. Martin, #2 Exhibit 1 - Proposed Order from July 2022, #3 Exhibit 2 - article, #4 Exhibit 3 - pleading related to cited cases, #5 Exhibit 4 - pleading related to cited cases, #6 Exhibit 5 - pleading related to cited cases, #7 Exhibit 6 - pleading related to cited cases, #8 Exhibit 7 - pleading related to cited cases)(Related document(s) #20 ) (Olthoff, Mark)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting #21 Defendants' Unopposed Joint Motion for Leave to File Suggestions in Opposition that Exceed 15 Pages in Length. Their suggestions in opposition to Plaintiff's Amended Motion to Remand, (Doc. 20), may exceed 15 pages but cannot be more than 30 pages. Signed on 9/23/2022 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Guy, Alec)
September 22, 2022 Filing 21 MOTION for order Defendants' Unopposed Joint Motion for Leave to File Suggestions in Opposition that Exceed 15 Pages in Length filed by Mark A. Olthoff on behalf of Stonebridge Global Partners, LLC. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/6/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Olthoff, Mark)
September 9, 2022 Filing 20 Amended MOTION to remand and Suggestions in Support filed by Gregory A. Leyh on behalf of Dorothy Simpson. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/23/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Leyh, Gregory)
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting #18 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File an Amended Motion to Remand. Plaintiff shall file the amended motion by September 14, 2022. The briefing schedule outlined in the Court's prior order, (Doc. 17), no longer applies. Instead, applicable deadlines will depend on when the amended motion is filed. Signed on 9/9/2022 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Guy, Alec)
September 9, 2022 Filing 18 MOTION for leave to file the Simpson Class Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amended Motion to Remand and Suggestions in Support filed by Gregory A. Leyh on behalf of Dorothy Simpson. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/23/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Amended Motion to Remand and Suggestions in Support)(Leyh, Gregory)
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER: Because Plaintiff's reply to Defendants' joint response to the Court's order to show cause, (Doc. 16), focuses on an issue that was not thoroughly addressed in prior briefing, it will be treated as an independent motion to remand. Accordingly, Defendants shall have 14 days to file an opposition. Thereafter, Plaintiff shall have 14 days to reply. Signed on 9/6/2022 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Guy, Alec)
September 6, 2022 Filing 16 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Dorothy Simpson. (Leyh, Gregory)
August 26, 2022 Filing 15 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Seldin Company. (Schrag, Jeremy)
August 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney James P. Martin for Stonebridge Global Partners, LLC allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Warren, Melissa)
August 19, 2022 Filing 13 Motion to allow James P. Martin to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-8068950) filed by Mark A. Olthoff on behalf of Stonebridge Global Partners, LLC. (Olthoff, Mark)
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED TO STATE COURT. Defendants are directed to show cause why the case should not be remanded because the removal is untimely under 28 U.S.C. 1446(c)(1). Defendants shall respond to this Order on or before August 29, 2022. Plaintiff shall have fourteen days thereafter to address Defendants response. Signed on 8/15/22 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Cordell, Annette)
August 15, 2022 Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Seldin Company filed by Jeremy K Schrag on behalf of Defendant Seldin Company.(Schrag, Jeremy)
August 11, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria)
August 10, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of appearance by Lauren E. Tucker McCubbin on behalf of Stonebridge Global Partners, LLC (Attorney Lauren E. Tucker McCubbin added to party Stonebridge Global Partners, LLC(pty:dft))(McCubbin, Lauren)
August 10, 2022 Filing 8 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Mark A. Olthoff on behalf of Defendant Stonebridge Global Partners, LLC.(Olthoff, Mark)
August 10, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of appearance by Mark A. Olthoff on behalf of Stonebridge Global Partners, LLC (Olthoff, Mark)
August 10, 2022 Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Seldin Company. (Schrag, Jeremy)
August 10, 2022 Filing 5 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS for Cloverleaf Apartments Investors, LLC filed by Daniel R. Zmijewski on behalf of Defendant Cloverleaf Apartments Investors, LLC.(Zmijewski, Daniel)
August 10, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of appearance by Daniel R. Zmijewski on behalf of Cloverleaf Apartments Investors, LLC (Attorney Daniel R. Zmijewski added to party Cloverleaf Apartments Investors, LLC(pty:dft))(Zmijewski, Daniel)
August 10, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of filing State Court Records Part 2 by Seldin Company re #1 Notice of Removal, (Schrag, Jeremy)
August 10, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of filing State Court Records Part 1 by Seldin Company re #1 Notice of Removal, (Schrag, Jeremy)
August 10, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Joint) from Circuit Court of Jackson County, case number 2116-CV11060, filed by Jeremy K Schrag. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-8054797. (Attachments: #1 Ex. A, #2 Ex. B, Mizrahie Declaration, #3 Ex. C, Initial Petition, #4 Ex. D, Class Certification Order, #5 Ex. E, Amended Petition, #6 Ex. F, Declaration of Powers, #7 Ex. G, Plaintiffs Answers To Stonebridge First Interrogatories, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schrag, Jeremy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Simpson v. Cloverleaf Apartments Investors, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dorothy Simpson
Represented By: Gregory A. Leyh
Represented By: Andrea M. Knernschield
Represented By: Nicholas Leyh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cloverleaf Apartments Investors, LLC
Represented By: Daniel R. Zmijewski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stonebridge Global Partners, LLC
Represented By: Mark A. Olthoff
Represented By: Lauren E. Tucker McCubbin
Represented By: James P. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Seldin Company
Represented By: Jeremy K Schrag
Represented By: Alan L. Rupe
Represented By: Karly Dorann Weigel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?