Brown v. Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc.
Plaintiff: Willis Jean Brown
Defendant: Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. doing business as Fresenius Medical Care of North America doing business as Fresenius Medical Care doing business as Fresenius Kidney Care Leawood
Case Number: 4:2022cv00529
Filed: August 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Stephen R Bough
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2022 Filing 13 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. (Richard, Tracey)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. (Doc. #8.) The Court has been advised that Defendant does not oppose the motion. Consequently, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. #8) is GRANTED. This case is hereby REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri. Signed on 9/28/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Richard, Tracey)
September 20, 2022 Filing 11 Before the Court is Defendant Fresenius USA Manufacturing's ("Defendant") Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. (Doc. #10.) For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall file its answer or other response to the Complaint on or before October 5, 2022. Signed on 9/20/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Richard, Tracey)
September 20, 2022 Filing 10 Consent MOTION for extension of time to file answer filed by Nicholas Slovikoski on behalf of Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/4/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Slovikoski, Nicholas)
September 14, 2022 Filing 9 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc.. (Slovikoski, Nicholas)
September 13, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION to remand filed by David W. Whipple on behalf of Willis Jean Brown. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/27/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 8-10-22 demand, #2 Exhibit Affidavit)(Whipple, David)
August 31, 2022 NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP)
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 10/20/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 11/3/2022 at 1:45 PM in Courtroom 7B, Kansas City (SRB) before District Judge Stephen R. Bough. Signed on 8/25/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Richard, Tracey)
August 22, 2022 Filing 6 Before the Court is Defendant Fresenius USA Manufacturing's ("Defendant") Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. (Doc. #5.) For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall file its answer or other response to the Complaint on or before September 21, 2022. Signed on 8/22/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Richard, Tracey)
August 22, 2022 Filing 5 Consent MOTION for extension of time to file answer filed by Tyson H. Ketchum on behalf of Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/6/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Ketchum, Tyson)
August 16, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of filing Proof of Filing in State Court by Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Ketchum, Tyson)
August 15, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria)
August 15, 2022 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Tyson H. Ketchum on behalf of Defendant Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc..(Ketchum, Tyson) Modified on 8/15/2022 main document 2 replaced at the request of counsel to correct filing oversight. (Kern, Kendra)
August 15, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County, case number 2216-CV14973, filed by Tyson H. Ketchum. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-8060685. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ketchum, Tyson) (Attachment 2 replaced on 8/15/2022 due to formatting error.) (Woods, Gloria).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willis Jean Brown
Represented By: David W. Whipple
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. doing business as Fresenius Medical Care of North America doing business as Fresenius Medical Care doing business as Fresenius Kidney Care Leawood
Represented By: Tyson H. Ketchum
Represented By: Nicholas Slovikoski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?