West v. Adecco USA, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Anthony West
Defendant: Adecco USA, Inc. and PGW Auto Glass, LLC
Case Number: 4:2022cv00573
Filed: September 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Howard F Sachs
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Order of Dismissal with prejudice, pursuant to #12 Stipulation of Dismissal. Each party to bear their own costs and fees. Signed on 7/27/23 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. (Anderson, Christy)
January 3, 2023 Filing 12 STIPULATION of dismissal by Anthony West. (Brown, Randall)
October 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER. The Parties' Stipulation and Joint Motion to Stay Proceeding Pending Arbitration is GRANTED. (Doc. #10 ). This proceeding shall be stayed while the parties engage in arbitration pursuant to a binding arbitration agreement. The parties should notify the court following the completion of arbitration or a a joint report as to the status of the case on or before April 3, 2023. Signed on 10/07/2022 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. (Nolte, Melissa)
October 5, 2022 Filing 10 STIPULATION and Joint Motion to Stay Proceeding Pending Arbitration by Adecco USA, Inc.. (Cervantes, Joshua)
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER. The Joint Motion for Extension of Time for Defendants to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Petition is GRANTED. Defendants Adecco USA, Inc. and PGW Auto Glass, LLC shall have up to and including October 7, 2022, in which to respond to Plaintiff's Petition. Signed on 9/26/2022 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. (Nolte, Melissa)
September 23, 2022 Filing 8 Joint MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply to Plaintiff's Petition filed by Joshua J Cervantes on behalf of Adecco USA, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/7/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Cervantes, Joshua)
September 14, 2022 NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP)
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 10/28/2022. Signed on 9/13/2022 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. (Nolte, Melissa)
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER. Defendant PGW Auto Glass, LLC's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Petition (Doc. #4 ) is GRANTED. Defendant PGW Auto Glass, LLC shall have up to and including September 23, 2022, in which to respond to Plaintiff's Petition. Signed on 9/9/2022 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. (Nolte, Melissa)
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER. Defendant Adecco USA, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond (Doc. #3 ) to Plaintiff's Petition is GRANTED. Defendant Adecco USA, Inc. shall have up to and including September 23, 2022, in which to respond to Plaintiff's Petition. Signed on 9/9/2022 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. (Nolte, Melissa)
September 8, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for extension of time to file answer to Plaintiff's Petition filed by Gregory D Ballew on behalf of PGW Auto Glass, LLC. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/22/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Ballew, Gregory)
September 8, 2022 Filing 3 Consent MOTION for extension of time to file answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Petition filed by Kyle B. Russell on behalf of Adecco USA, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/22/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Russell, Kyle)
September 2, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria)
September 2, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County, case number 2216-CV16328, filed by Gregory D Ballew. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-8091823. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A State Court Filings, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ballew, Gregory)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: West v. Adecco USA, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony West
Represented By: Randall W. Brown
Represented By: Stephen C Thornberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adecco USA, Inc.
Represented By: Kyle B. Russell
Represented By: Joshua J Cervantes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PGW Auto Glass, LLC
Represented By: Gregory D Ballew
Represented By: Lydia M Middleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?