Bradley v. Wu et al
Plaintiff: Deanna Bradley
Defendant: Xue Hou Wu and Hua Er Gao
Case Number: 4:2022cv00630
Filed: October 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Beth Phillips
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2022 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Hua Er Gao and Xue Hou Wu. (Kern, Kendra)
October 31, 2022 Filing 6 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Amy Ashbrook on behalf of Deanna Bradley. Service due by 1/30/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court.(Ashbrook, Amy)
October 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, (Doc. 1), is GRANTED, subject to further consideration upon demonstration that the action should be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The Clerk of the Court is directed to docket Plaintiff's Complaint and mark it as filed on October 4, 2022. Signed on 10/12/22 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Cordell, Annette)
October 4, 2022 Filing 5 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Amy Ashbrook on behalf of Deanna Bradley. Service due by 1/3/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Melvin, Greg)
October 4, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to Program Director. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Ellis, Lindsey)
October 4, 2022 Filing 2 DELETED- documents have been added to docket entry #1 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Amy Ashbrook on behalf of DEANNA BRADLEY. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/18/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Complaint, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Ashbrook, Amy) Modified on 10/4/2022 to note documents were deleted and added to docket entry #1 ; NEF regenerated (Ellis, Lindsey).
October 4, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Amy Ashbrook on behalf of DEANNA BRADLEY. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/18/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attorney Amy Ashbrook added to party DEANNA BRADLEY(pty:pla))(Ashbrook, Amy) Modified on 10/4/2022 replaced Motion for IFP as it did not include the Defendant information, added the Complaint and Civil Cover Sheet from docket entry 2 (Ellis, Lindsey).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bradley v. Wu et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deanna Bradley
Represented By: Amy Ashbrook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Xue Hou Wu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hua Er Gao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?