Johnson v. USA
Petitioner: Anthony J. Johnson
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 4:2022cv00668
Filed: October 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Greg Kays
Referring Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER that Movant's motion to amend or supplement his 2255 motion (Doc. #8 ) is DENIED without prejudice as this case was dismissed on December 5, 2022 (Doc. 6) and Movant has failed to comply with the Court's order. Signed on 12/15/2022 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Willis, Kathy)
December 13, 2022 Filing 8 MOVANT'S MOTION to amend or supplemental his 2255 Motion filed by Anthony J. Johnson. (Willis, Kathy)
December 5, 2022 Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: This case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Orders. Any motion to reopen this case must be filed within a reasonable time and must comply with the Court's previous Order. (Willis, Kathy)
December 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that this case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Orders. Any motion to reopen this case must be filed within a reasonable time and must comply with the Court's previous Order. Signed on 12/5/2022 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Willis, Kathy)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that Movant file a reply in support of his motion on or before November 30, 2022. Movant's failure to file a timely reply may result in dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 11/2/2022 by District Judge Greg Kays. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
October 28, 2022 Filing 4 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Sean T Foley on behalf of Respondent USA. Reply suggestions due by 11/14/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Foley, Sean)
October 21, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of appearance by Sean T Foley on behalf of USA (Attorney Sean T Foley added to party USA(pty:res))(Foley, Sean)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER that Respondent answer Movant's allegations and show cause on or before November 18, 2022, why the relief Movant seeks should not be granted. Signed on 10/19/2022 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Willis, Kathy)
October 17, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION to vacate, set aside or correct sentence (2255) filed by Anthony J. Johnson. (#1 Attachments and Grounds)(Willis, Kathy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Anthony J. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Sean T Foley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?