Bradley v. AKI 3801 Truman Rd LLC
Plaintiff: Deanna Bradley
Defendant: AKI 3801 Truman Rd LLC
Case Number: 4:2022cv00701
Filed: October 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Beth Phillips
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Defendant AKI 3801 Truman Rd, LLC's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is GRANTED, up to and including January 23, 2023. Signed on 12/22/22 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Cordell, Annette)
December 22, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION for extension of time to file answer filed by Joseph J. Roper on behalf of AKI 3801 Truman Rd LLC. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/5/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attorney Joseph J. Roper added to party AKI 3801 Truman Rd LLC(pty:dft))(Roper, Joseph)
December 4, 2022 Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Deanna Bradley. AKI 3801 Truman Rd LLC served on 12/3/2022, answer due 12/27/2022. (Andres, Jonathan)
November 7, 2022 SUMMONS ISSUED as to AKI 3801 Truman Rd LLC. (Ellis, Lindsey)
November 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #1 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, (Doc. 1), is GRANTED, subject to further consideration upon demonstration that the action should be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The Clerk of the Court is directed to docket Plaintiff's Complaint and mark it as filed on October 31, 2022. Signed on 11/1/22 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Cordell, Annette)
October 31, 2022 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against AKI 3801 Truman Rd LLC filed by Jonathan F. Andres on behalf of Deanna Bradley. Service due by 1/30/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Supplement Summons)(Andres, Jonathan) Modified on 11/2/2022: Supplement Summons deleted. Filing date changed to 10/31/2022. NEF regenerated. (Melvin, Greg)
October 31, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jonathan F. Andres on behalf of Deanna Bradley. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/14/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Supplement Summons)(Attorney Jonathan F. Andres added to party Deanna Bradley(pty:pla))(Andres, Jonathan) Modified on 10/31/2022 to reflect summons removed from filing documents. Summons returned to counsel via email. (Woods, Gloria).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bradley v. AKI 3801 Truman Rd LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deanna Bradley
Represented By: Jonathan F. Andres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AKI 3801 Truman Rd LLC
Represented By: Joseph J. Roper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?