Young v. USA
Petitioner: Paris B Young
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 4:2022cv00719
Filed: October 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Greg Kays
Referring Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2022 Filing 9 MOVANT'S RESPONSE to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Paris B Young. (Attachment: #1 Response Exhibits)(Willis, Kathy)
December 12, 2022 Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: This case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the Court's Order. Any motion to reopen this case must be filed within a reasonable time and must be accompanied by Movant's response to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. (Willis, Kathy)
December 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDERED that this case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the Courts Order. Any motion to reopen this case must be filed within a reasonable time and must be accompanied by Movant's response to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, as previously ordered. Signed on 12/12/2022 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Willis, Kathy)
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that Movant file his response to Respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. #5 ), on or before December 5, 2022, or this case will be dismissed without further notice. Signed on 11/14/2022 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Willis, Kathy)
November 14, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION to dismiss case Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 filed by Jeffrey Quinn McCarther on behalf of USA. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/28/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (McCarther, Jeffrey)
November 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDERED that Respondent answer Movant's allegations and show cause on or before December 2, 2022, why the relief Movant seeks should not be granted. Signed on 11/3/2022 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Willis, Kathy)
November 3, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of appearance by Jeffrey Quinn McCarther on behalf of USA (Attorney Jeffrey Quinn McCarther added to party USA(pty:res))(McCarther, Jeffrey)
October 31, 2022 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support filed by Paris B Young. (#1 Memorandum Exhibits) (Related document #1 ) (Willis, Kathy)
October 31, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION to vacate, set aside or correct sentence (2255) filed by Paris B Young. (#1 2255 attachments)(Willis, Kathy) (Main Document 1 replaced on 11/3/2022) (Willis, Kathy).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Young v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Paris B Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Jeffrey Quinn McCarther
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?