Chappell v. Menard, Inc.
| Scharmaine Chappell |
| Menard, Inc. |
| 4:2022cv00743 |
| November 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Fernando J Gaitan |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Menard, Inc. filed by Byron A Bowles on behalf of Defendant Menard, Inc..(Bowles, Byron) |
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Report due by 7/5/2023. Discovery due by 8/4/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 10/6/2023. Please see Order for additional deadlines. Signed on 1/5/23 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Anderson, Christy)
|
| NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your post-mediation status report is due within 10 calendar days after the mediation. See MAP FAQs on Court's website for specifics and submit report(s) to: map@mow.uscourts.gov. (ADI, MAP) |
| Filing 8 DESIGNATION OF MEDIATOR naming Robert Schieber(Low, Spencer) |
| Filing 7 Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Scharmaine Chappell. (Riggins, Anthony) |
| NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP) |
|
Filing 6
RULE 16 NOTICE. Rule 26 conference due by 12/15/2022. Proposed scheduling order due by 12/29/2022. Signed on 11/14/22 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Anderson, Christy)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of appearance by Spencer Low on behalf of Menard, Inc. (Attorney Spencer Low added to party Menard, Inc.(pty:dft))(Low, Spencer) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Byron A Bowles on behalf of Defendant Menard, Inc..(Bowles, Byron) |
| Filing 2 Defendant Menard, Inc.'s ANSWER to Complaint on behalf of Menard, Inc..(Bowles, Byron) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County, case number 2216-CV22569, filed by Byron A Bowles. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-8190489. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bowles, Byron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chappell v. Menard, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Scharmaine Chappell | |
| Represented By: | Anthony Riggins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Menard, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Spencer Low |
| Represented By: | Byron A Bowles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
