Brayfield v. The Bureaus, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: James G. Brayfield, Jr.
Defendant: The Bureaus, Inc. and Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC
Case Number: 4:2022cv00754
Filed: November 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Fernando J Gaitan
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER re #11 Notice of Settlement filed by The Bureaus, Inc., Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC. This case has been reported as settled in principle as to all claims and parties. In order to monitor its docket, the Court ORDERS the parties to file a stipulation of dismissal or status report on or before 2/3/2023. Signed on 01/05/2023 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Powers, Jo)
December 29, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of settlement by All Defendants (Brodzik, James)
December 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER - GRANTING #9 defendants' unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. New Deadline: Answers due on or before 12/30/2022.. Signed on 12/9/22 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Anderson, Christy)
December 9, 2022 Filing 9 Consent MOTION for extension of time to file answer filed by James M Brodzik on behalf of All Defendants. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/23/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Brodzik, James)
December 9, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of appearance by James M Brodzik on behalf of All Defendants (Attorney James M Brodzik added to party Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney James M Brodzik added to party The Bureaus, Inc.(pty:dft))(Brodzik, James)
December 2, 2022 Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by James G. Brayfield, Jr. Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC served on 11/21/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. (Philipps, David)
December 2, 2022 Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by James G. Brayfield, Jr. The Bureaus, Inc. served on 11/21/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. (Philipps, David)
November 17, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Kern, Kendra)
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 and #3 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Mary E. Philipps and David J. Philipps for James G. Brayfield, Jr allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Warren, Melissa)
November 17, 2022 Filing 3 Motion to allow David J. Philipps to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-8197455) filed by James Crump on behalf of James G. Brayfield, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Movant David J. Philipps)(Crump, James)
November 17, 2022 Filing 2 Motion to allow Mary E. Philipps to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-8197445) filed by James Crump on behalf of James G. Brayfield, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Movant Mary E. Philipps)(Crump, James)
November 17, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC, The Bureaus, Inc. filed by James Crump on behalf of James G. Brayfield, Jr. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-8197414. Service due by 2/15/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Crump, James)
November 17, 2022 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC, The Bureaus, Inc.. (Kern, Kendra)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brayfield v. The Bureaus, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James G. Brayfield, Jr.
Represented By: David J. Philipps
Represented By: Mary E. Philipps
Represented By: Ryan Callahan
Represented By: James Crump
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Bureaus, Inc.
Represented By: James M Brodzik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC
Represented By: James M Brodzik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?