Owens v. USA
| Mitchell E Owens |
| USA |
| 4:2022cv00803 |
| December 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Beth Phillips |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER that Movant's motion for extension of time (Doc. #6 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Movant's motion is denied as to his request to stay this case indefinitely for the reasons explained in Respondent's response (Doc. #7 ). However, Movant's motion is granted as to an extension of time and Movant shall file a reply in support of his motion on or before February 23, 2023. Movant's failure to file a timely reply may result in dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 1/23/2023 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 7 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #6 MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply as to 5 Order, MOTION to stay filed by Maureen Brackett on behalf of Respondent USA. Reply suggestions due by 2/3/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #6 ) (Brackett, Maureen) |
| Filing 6 MOVANT'S MOTION for extension of time to file reply and MOTION to stay filed by Mitchell E Owens. (Related document 5 ) (Willis, Kathy) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER that Movant file a reply in support of his motion on or before January 23, 2023. Movant's failure to file a timely reply may result in dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 12/21/2022 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 4 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Maureen Brackett on behalf of Respondent USA. Reply suggestions due by 1/4/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Attorney Maureen Brackett added to party USA(pty:res))(Brackett, Maureen) |
|
Filing 3
ORDERED that Respondent answer Movant's allegations and show cause on or before JANUARY 6, 2023, why the relief Movant seeks should not be granted. Signed on 12/7/2022 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support of 2255 Motion filed by Mitchell E Owens.Related document #1 ) (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to vacate, set aside or correct sentence (2255) filed by Mitchell E Owens.(Willis, Kathy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Owens v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Mitchell E Owens | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Maureen Brackett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
