Claxton v. Irlam
| Steven Claxton |
| John Irlam |
| 4:2023cv00055 |
| January 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Beth Phillips |
| Howard F Sachs |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER denying #8 Plaintiff's motion to remand is DENIED. Signed on 3/20/23 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Cordell, Annette)
|
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES filed by Paul Joseph Taylor on behalf of Plaintiff Steven Claxton.(Taylor, Paul) |
| Filing 15 DESIGNATION OF MEDIATOR naming Hon. Joseph P. Dandurand(Taylor, Paul) |
| Filing 14 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #8 MOTION to remand filed by Kyle Henry Sciolaro on behalf of Plaintiff Steven Claxton. (Related document(s) #8 ) (Sciolaro, Kyle) |
| Filing 13 Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Steven Claxton. (Taylor, Paul) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #9 MOTION to consolidate cases. Reply suggestions due by 3/23/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Melvin, Greg) |
| Filing 12 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #9 MOTION to consolidate cases filed by Kyle Henry Sciolaro on behalf of Plaintiff Steven Claxton. Reply suggestions due by 3/23/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Suggestions in Opposition to Motion to Consolidate)(Sciolaro, Kyle) Modified on 3/10/2023: Docket text changed to reflect filing event. Reply deadlines added. NEF regenerated. (Melvin, Greg) |
| Filing 11 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #8 MOTION to remand filed by Patrick David Kuehl, Jr on behalf of Defendant John Irlam. Reply suggestions due by 3/13/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Related document(s) #8 ) (Kuehl, Patrick) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER TRANSFERRING/REASSIGNING CASE. Upon the consent, this case has been reassigned to Chief District Judge Beth Phillips for all further proceedings. District Judge Howard F. Sachs no longer assigned to case. Signed on 2/27/23 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. (Anderson, Christy)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #9 MOTION to consolidate cases. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/9/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Kern, Kendra) |
| Filing 9 Motion for Consolidation by John Irlam. Suggestions in Opposition/Response Deadline 3/09/2023 unles otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Kuehl, Patrick) Modified on 2/24/2023 to correct filing event and set deadlines. NEF regenerated to all parties. (Kern, Kendra) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to remand filed by Kyle Henry Sciolaro on behalf of Steven Claxton. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/2/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Sciolaro, Kyle) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand on behalf of John Irlam.(Kuehl, Patrick) |
| NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of filing Proof of Filing in State Court by John Irlam (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Kuehl, Patrick) |
|
Filing 5
RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 3/13/2023. Signed on 1/27/23 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. (Anderson, Christy)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT from Magistrate Judge Jill A. Morris to District Judge Howard F. Sachs. Please note the new case number: 22-55-CV-W-HFS. (Melvin, Greg) |
|
Filing 2
Due to a conflict of interest by the Honorable Jill A. Morris, it is ORDERED that this case be randomly reassigned for all further proceedings. Signed on 1/26/23 by Magistrate Judge Jill A. Morris. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Suroff, Rebecca)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County, case number 2216-CV28295, filed by Patrick David Kuehl, Jr. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-8296519. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kuehl, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Claxton v. Irlam | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven Claxton | |
| Represented By: | Kyle Henry Sciolaro |
| Represented By: | Derrick A Pearce |
| Represented By: | Paul Joseph Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Irlam | |
| Represented By: | Steven Martin Aaron |
| Represented By: | Patrick David Kuehl, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
