K. A. et al v. Kijakazi
| K. A. and Nastassa Warrior |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 4:2023cv00183 |
| March 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Brian C Wimes |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 si Review of HHS Decision (RSI) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDERED Defendant's motion for an extension of time to file its answer and/or CAR to Plaintiffs' complaint (Doc. #10) is GRANTED. Defendant shall file its Answer and/or CAR by July 14, 2023. Signed on 5/11/23 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Diefenbach, Tracy)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to extend Social Security deadlines for filing of Defendants Answer and/or Submission of Administrative Record, on or before July 14, 2023 filed by Jeffrey P. Ray on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/24/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Ray, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of appearance by Jeffrey P. Ray on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Attorney Jeffrey P. Ray added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Ray, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 8 PRO SE SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT K. A., Nastassa Warrior filed byK. A., Nastassa Warrior. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ellis, Lindsey) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Social Security Case. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has generated a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the U.S. Attorney's Office of the case filing. No summons shall issue. (Notice mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff via U.S. Mail). (Ellis, Lindsey) Modified on 3/16/2023 to reflect notice has been mailed to: Nastassa Warrior 4601 NE 46th Street Kansas City, MO 64117 (Ellis, Lindsey). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #1 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.. Signed on 3/16/23 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Diefenbach, Tracy) Copy of this order mailed to: Nastassa Warrior, 4601 NE 46th Street, Kansas City, MO 64117
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #3 motion to appoint counsel. Signed on 3/16/23 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Diefenbach, Tracy) Copy of this order mailed to: Nastassa Warrior, 4601 NE 46th Street, Kansas City, MO 64117
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT from Magistrate Judge Lajuana M. Counts to District Judge Brian C. Wimes. Please note the new case number: 23-183-CV-W-BCW. (Melvin, Greg) |
| Filing 3 Pro Se MOTION to appoint counsel filed by Nastassa Warrior. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/29/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 2 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Nastassa Warrior. (Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 1 Pro Se MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Nastassa Warrior. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/29/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Woods, Gloria) |
| NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT as to Plaintiff: Plaintiff must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge assignment. Click # here for instructions. Form due by 4/5/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. Magistrate Consent form hand delivered to pro se plaintiff in office on today's date. (Woods, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
