Brown v. ARC Document Solutions et al
Chantell C Brown |
ARC Document Solutions, Kenya Davis, Ron Frazier, Jeff Huffman and Chris Bonner |
4:2023cv00438 |
June 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Fernando J Gaitan |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of filing Kansas Civil Rights Commission letter by Chantell C Brown (Houston, Kiambu) |
Filing 4 ORDER directing the plaintiff to supplement her application, in writing, on or before August 9, 2023. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to supplement her application may result in the Court ruling in accordance with the current record. Signed on 7/12/23 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Anderson, Christy)Copy of Order mailed via first class mail to Chantell C Brown at 15906 E South Ave., Independence, MO 64050. |
Filing 3 Pro Se MOTION to appoint counsel filed by Chantell C Brown. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/6/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 2 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Chantell C Brown. (Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 1 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Chantell C Brown. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/6/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Woods, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.