Armknecht v. PetSmart, LLC
| Randa Kym Armknecht |
| PetSmart, LLC |
| 4:2023cv00468 |
| July 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Greg Kays |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUGGESTIONS in support re #4 MOTION to dismiss case or in the Alternative to Stay and Compel Arbitration filed by Jeffrey D Hanslick on behalf of Defendant PetSmart, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Related document(s) #4 ) (Hanslick, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 7 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #4 MOTION to dismiss case or in the Alternative to Stay and Compel Arbitration filed by Jasmine Jamal Abou-Kassem on behalf of Plaintiff Randa Kym Armknecht. Reply suggestions due by 8/7/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit of Randa Armknecht)(Related document(s) #4 ) (Abou-Kassem, Jasmine) |
Filing 6
RULE 16 NOTICE. Rule 26 conference due by 8/24/2023. Proposed scheduling order due by 9/7/2023. Signed on 7/24/23 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Strodtman, Tracy)
|
| Filing 5 SUGGESTIONS in support re #4 MOTION to dismiss case or in the Alternative to Stay and Compel Arbitration filed by Bayli Martin on behalf of Defendant PetSmart, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Related document(s) #4 ) (Martin, Bayli) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to dismiss case or in the Alternative to Stay and Compel Arbitration filed by Bayli Martin on behalf of PetSmart, LLC. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/27/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Martin, Bayli) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Jeffrey D Hanslick on behalf of Defendant PetSmart, LLC.(Hanslick, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to Program Director. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Cass County, case number 23CA-CC00111, filed by Jeffrey D Hanslick. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-8524441. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hanslick, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Armknecht v. PetSmart, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Randa Kym Armknecht | |
| Represented By: | Jasmine Jamal Abou-Kassem |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PetSmart, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Bayli Martin |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey D Hanslick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
