Dobbins v. Vilsack
| Sara Dobbins |
| Thomas J Vilsack |
| 4:2023cv00632 |
| September 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Lajuana M Counts |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Sara Dobbins. Thomas Vilsack served on 10/11/2023. (Randles, Rebecca) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET MODIFICATION. A modification has been made to the document filed on 10/23/2023 as Document No. 4, Summons in a Civil Action. The document has been deleted as the incorrect event was used when filing the document. Counsel will refile the document using the correct event - Return of Service of Complaint Executed as to USA. This is a text entry only - no document is attached. (Crocker, Susan) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Sara Dobbins. (Randles, Rebecca) |
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Sara Dobbins. Thomas J Vilsack served on 9/28/2023, answer due 10/19/2023. (Randles, Rebecca) |
| SECOND NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT as to Plaintiff: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge assignment. Click # here for instructions. Form due by 11/3/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Melvin, Greg) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Thomas J Vilsack, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to outside neutral category I. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT as to Plaintiff: Plaintiff must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge assignment. Click # here for instructions. Form due by 10/3/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Thomas J Vilsack filed by Rebecca M. Randles on behalf of Sara Dobbins. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-8616873. Service due by 12/11/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Email and FAD, #2 Exhibit 2 Final Order and NORTF, #3 Exhibit 3 Investigator's Report)(Randles, Rebecca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dobbins v. Vilsack | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sara Dobbins | |
| Represented By: | Rebecca M. Randles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Thomas J Vilsack | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
