Davis v. Redington
Plaintiff: Derik Davis
Respondent: Dan Redington and Clay Stanton
Case Number: 4:2023cv00655
Filed: September 19, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Gary A Fenner
Referring Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2023 Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: This case is dismissed, without prejudice, subject to Petitioner seeking and obtaining authorization to file a second or successive petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Willis, Kathy)
September 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDERED that this case is dismissed, without prejudice, subject to Petitioner seeking and obtaining authorization to file a second or successive petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed on 9/26/2023 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (Willis, Kathy)
August 15, 2023 Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF TRANSFER TO OTHER DISTRICT to: United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. #5 ] is provisionally GRANTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 and subject to modification by the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. See 28 U.S.C. 2241(d). ( Case to be transferred after 8/29/2023.) Signed by Sr. District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 8/15/2023. (CLH) [Transferred from moed on 9/19/2023.]
August 10, 2023 Filing 6 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Petitioner Derik Davis. (NEP) Modified on 8/15/2023 (ANP). [Transferred from moed on 9/19/2023.]
August 10, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Derik Davis. (NEP) Modified on 8/15/2023 (ANP). [Transferred from moed on 9/19/2023.]
August 10, 2023 Filing 4 AMENDED PETITION against defendant Dan Redington Amendment to #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus no Summons(es) issued, Waivers issued none, Consents issued none, jury demand,, filed by Derik Davis. Related document: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Derik Davis. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(NEP) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/14/2023) (NEP). [Transferred from moed on 9/19/2023.]
July 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall file an amended petition on the Court-provided form within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Petitioner is advised that his amended petition will take the place of his original petition and will be the only pleading that this Court will review. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall either pay the $5 filing fee or submit the "Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Affidavit in Support Habeas Cases" within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Petitioner fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. (Response to Court due by 8/10/2023.). Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 7/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 Form Petition, #2 Form Motion)(NEP) [Transferred from moed on 9/19/2023.]
July 11, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 3. Tue Jul 11 13:09:50 CDT 2023 (Phillips, Nicole) [Transferred from moed on 9/19/2023.]
July 6, 2023 Filing 2 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto) [Transferred from moed on 9/19/2023.]
July 6, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Derik Davis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JWD) [Transferred from moed on 9/19/2023.]
July 6, 2023 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable John M. Bodenhausen. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JWD) [Transferred from moed on 9/19/2023.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Redington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Derik Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dan Redington
Represented By: Office of Missouri Attorney General - Habeas Division
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Clay Stanton
Represented By: Office of Missouri Attorney General - Habeas Division
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?