Johnson v. Lenz et al
| Taquiza V. Johnson |
| Police Officer Lance Lenz, Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, Lance Lenz and Jonathan Lenz |
| 4:2023cv00753 |
| October 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Bough |
| Roseann Ketchmark |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 28
ORDER granting #27 motion to withdraw as attorney. Attorney Nathan Severance Weinert terminated. Signed on 12/15/2023 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Casey, Susan)
|
| Filing 27 MOTION to withdraw as attorney filed by Nathan Severance Weinert on behalf of Jonathan Lenz. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/2/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Weinert, Nathan) |
| Filing 26 DESIGNATION OF MEDIATOR naming Robert Scheiber(Meyer, Mark) |
| Filing 25 PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Taquiza V. Johnson. (Meyer, Mark) |
| Filing 24 REPORT of Rule 26(f) planning meeting. (Meyer, Mark) |
| Filing 23 SUGGESTIONS in support re #22 MOTION to stay Defendants' Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners by and through its individual Commissioners, David Kenner and Lance Lenz Motion to Stay Discovery, Mediation, and Rule 26 Activates Defendants' Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners by and Through its individual Commissioners, David Kenner and Lance Lenz Suggestions in Support of Motion to Stay Discovery, Mediation, and Rule 26 Activities filed by Joshua Joseph Sieg on behalf of Defendants Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, Lance Lenz. (Related document(s) #22 ) (Sieg, Joshua) |
| Filing 22 MOTION to stay Defendants' Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners by and through its individual Commissioners, David Kenner and Lance Lenz Motion to Stay Discovery, Mediation, and Rule 26 Activates filed by Joshua Joseph Sieg on behalf of Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, Lance Lenz. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/27/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Sieg, Joshua) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of filing Exhibit 1 by Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, Lance Lenz re #20 Reply Suggestions to Motion, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Part 2)(Sieg, Joshua) |
| Filing 20 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendant' Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners By and Through its individual Commissioners, David Kenner and Lance Lenz Reply Suggestions filed by Joshua Joseph Sieg on behalf of Defendants Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, Lance Lenz. (Related document(s) #8 ) (Attorney Joshua Joseph Sieg added to party Lance Lenz(pty:dft))(Sieg, Joshua) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of appearance by Walter M. Brown on behalf of Jonathan Lenz (Attorney Walter M. Brown added to party Jonathan Lenz(pty:dft))(Brown, Walter) |
| Filing 18 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AMENDED (Additions at pages 3-4) filed by Edward Andrew Stump on behalf of Plaintiff Taquiza V. Johnson. Reply suggestions due by 12/13/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #8 ) (Stump, Edward) |
| Filing 17 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Mark Eldon Meyer on behalf of Plaintiff Taquiza V. Johnson. Reply suggestions due by 12/13/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #8 ) (Meyer, Mark) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Jonathan Lenz answer due 12/28/2023. Signed on 11/28/2023 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Skelton, Sara)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for extension of time to file answer filed by Nathan Severance Weinert on behalf of Jonathan Lenz. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/12/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Weinert, Nathan) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of appearance by Nathan Severance Weinert on behalf of Jonathan Lenz (Attorney Nathan Severance Weinert added to party Jonathan Lenz(pty:dft))(Weinert, Nathan) |
| NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP reassignment to outside neutral category I. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 12 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Taquiza V. Johnson. Jonathan Lenz served on 11/7/2023, answer due 11/28/2023. (Meyer, Mark) |
|
Filing 11
RULE 16 NOTICE. Rule 26 conference due by 12/16/2023. Proposed scheduling order due by 12/30/2023. Signed on November 16, 2023 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Wheeler, LaTandra)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of appearance by Adam J. Merello on behalf of Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners (Attorney Adam J. Merello added to party Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners(pty:dft))(Merello, Adam) |
| Filing 9 SUGGESTIONS in support re #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Joshua Joseph Sieg on behalf of Defendant Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners. (Related document(s) #8 ) (Sieg, Joshua) |
| Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Joshua Joseph Sieg on behalf of Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/29/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Sieg, Joshua) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of appearance by Joshua Joseph Sieg on behalf of Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners (Attorney Joshua Joseph Sieg added to party Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners(pty:dft))(Sieg, Joshua) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Taquiza V. Johnson. Lance Lenz served on 10/24/2023, answer due 11/14/2023. (Meyer, Mark) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Taquiza V. Johnson. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners served on 10/25/2023, answer due 11/15/2023. (Stump, Edward) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Edward Andrew Stump on behalf of Taquiza V. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Stump, Edward) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jonathan Lenz. (Woods, Gloria) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, Lance Lenz. (Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to United States Magistrate Judge W. Brian Gaddy. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 2 ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSFER. Due to a conflict of interest by the Honorable Judge Stephen R. Bough, this case is randomly reassigned to the Honorable Judge Roseann Ketchmark for all further proceedings. District Judge Stephen R. Bough no longer assigned to case. Please note the new case number is 4:23-00753-CV-W-RK. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Matthes Mitra, Renea) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Edward Andrew Stump on behalf of Taquiza V. Johnson. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-8677338. Service due by 1/17/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Stump, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
