Shores v. Brewer
Andrew Shores |
Chris Brewer |
4:2023cv00877 |
November 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Greg Kays |
Prisoner Pro Se |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 PETITIONER'S SURREPLY filed by Andrew Shores. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(Related document 8 ) (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 10 PETITIONER'S REPLY to the State's response (Doc. #5 ) filed by Andrew Shores.(Related document 8 ) (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of filing filed by Andrew Shores. (Related Doc. 1) (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 8 ORDER that Petitioner file a reply to the State's response (Doc. 5) by January 31, 2024. Signed on January 3, 2024, by District Judge Greg Kays. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Law Clerk) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Respondent's motion to seal the petition. For good cause shown, the petition (Doc. 1) is hereby SEALED. Signed on January 3, 2024, by District Judge Greg Kays. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Law Clerk) |
Filing 6 MOTION to seal document #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Patrick Logan on behalf of Chris Brewer. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/16/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Logan, Patrick) |
Filing 5 RESPONSE to order re 3 Order to Show Cause, filed by Patrick Logan on behalf of Respondent Chris Brewer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (DA Brief), #2 Exhibit B (State's DA Brief), #3 Exhibit C (DA Opinion), #4 Exhibit D (PCR Brief), #5 Exhibit E (State's PCR Brief), #6 Exhibit F (PCR Reply Brief), #7 Exhibit G (PCR Opinion), #8 Exhibit H (PCR Mandate))(Related document(s) 3 ) (Logan, Patrick) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of appearance by Patrick Logan on behalf of Chris Brewer (Attorney Patrick Logan added to party Chris Brewer(pty:res))(Logan, Patrick) |
Filing 3 ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) Respondent answer Petitioner's allegations and show cause on or before JANUARY 2, 2024, why the relief Petitioner seeks should not be granted. Signed on 11/30/2023 by District Judge Greg Kays. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Andrew Shores. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Andrew Shores. (Attachments: #1 Grounds, #2 Exhibits)(Willis, Kathy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Shores v. Brewer | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Andrew Shores | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Chris Brewer | |
Represented By: | Patrick Logan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.