Cummings v. Papa John's USA, Inc. et al
David Sterling Cummings |
Papa John's USA, Inc. and Kelly Jarvis |
4:2023cv00884 |
December 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Fernando J Gaitan |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 16 PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Kelly Jarvis, Papa John's USA, Inc.. (Ketchum, Tyson) |
Filing 15 DESIGNATION OF NEUTRAL naming Robert M. Schieber(Ketchum, Tyson) |
Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES filed by Tyson H. Ketchum on behalf of Defendants Kelly Jarvis, Papa John's USA, Inc..(Ketchum, Tyson) |
Filing 13 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #7 MOTION to remand filed by Cody Lee Wiegers on behalf of Plaintiff David Sterling Cummings. (Related document(s) #7 ) (Wiegers, Cody) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES filed by Cody Lee Wiegers on behalf of Plaintiff David Sterling Cummings.(Wiegers, Cody) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint on behalf of Kelly Jarvis. (Ketchum, Tyson) Modified on 1/11/2024: Main document replaced to reflect correct defendant. Docket text changed. NEF regenerated. (Melvin, Greg) |
|
Filing 9 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #7 MOTION to remand Defendant Papa John's Suggestions in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Tyson H. Ketchum on behalf of Defendant Papa John's USA, Inc.. Reply suggestions due by 1/17/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #7 ) (Ketchum, Tyson) |
Filing 8 MOTION for order Extension to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to and including January 3, 2024 re #7 MOTION to remand , MOTION for Order (SEALED) filed by Tyson H. Ketchum on behalf of Papa John's USA, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/10/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #7 ) (Ketchum, Tyson) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Kelly Jarvis. (Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 7 MOTION to remand filed by Cody Lee Wiegers on behalf of David Sterling Cummings. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/27/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Wiegers, Cody) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of filing Notice of Removal in State Court by Papa John's USA, Inc. (Ketchum, Tyson) |
NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP) |
|
Filing 4 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to outside neutral category I. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 3 Defendant Papa John's USA, Inc.'s ANSWER to Complaint Amended Petition on behalf of Papa John's USA, Inc..(Ketchum, Tyson) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Tyson H. Ketchum on behalf of Defendant Papa John's USA, Inc..(Ketchum, Tyson) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Clay County County, case number 23CY-CV08693, filed by Tyson H. Ketchum. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-8743001. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ketchum, Tyson) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.