Smith v. New Liberty Hospital Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Smith
Defendant: New Liberty Hospital Corporation and New Liberty Hospital District
Case Number: 4:2023cv00890
Filed: December 7, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Stephen R Bough
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2024 Filing 11 Before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings. (Doc. #2.) For the reasons stated within, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Signed on 1/25/2024 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Murphy-Carr, Shauna)
January 25, 2024 Filing 10 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #2 MOTION to dismiss case , or in the Alternative, Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings filed by Ashley N. Garrett on behalf of Defendants New Liberty Hospital Corporation, New Liberty Hospital District. (Related document(s) #2 ) (Garrett, Ashley)
January 11, 2024 Filing 9 Before the Court is Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Defendants' Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings. (Doc. #8). Upon review, the motion is GRANTED. Defendants may file their reply brief on or before January 25, 2024. Signed on 1/11/24 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Diefenbach, Tracy)
January 11, 2024 Filing 8 MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply as to #2 MOTION to dismiss case , or in the Alternative, Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings Unopposed filed by Ashley N. Garrett on behalf of New Liberty Hospital Corporation, New Liberty Hospital District. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/25/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Related document(s) #2 ) (Garrett, Ashley)
January 3, 2024 Filing 7 RETURN OF WAIVER OF SERVICE filed by New Liberty Hospital District, New Liberty Hospital Corporation. Waiver sent to New Liberty Hospital District on 12/29/2023, answer due 2/27/2024; New Liberty Hospital Corporation on 12/29/2023, answer due 2/27/2024. (Housley, Casey)
December 28, 2023 Filing 6 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #2 MOTION to dismiss case , or in the Alternative, Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings filed by Nickalaus C. Seacord on behalf of Plaintiff Elizabeth Smith. Reply suggestions due by 1/11/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #2 ) (Seacord, Nickalaus)
December 14, 2023 Filing 5 Before the Court is Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Oppose Defendants Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. #4.) Upon review, the motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file her response to Defendants' motion on or before December 28, 2023. Signed on 12/14/23 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Diefenbach, Tracy)
December 14, 2023 Filing 4 First MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply filed by Nickalaus C. Seacord on behalf of Elizabeth Smith. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/28/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Seacord, Nickalaus)
December 7, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to United States Magistrate Judge Lajuana M. Counts. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria)
December 7, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION to dismiss case , or in the Alternative, Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings filed by Ashley N. Garrett on behalf of New Liberty Hospital Corporation, New Liberty Hospital District. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/21/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Garrett, Ashley)
December 7, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Clay County, case number 23CY-CV07165, Filing fee $405, receipt number AMOWDC-8747479. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, State Court Action, #2 Exhibit B, Notice of Removal to Circuit Court, #3 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet)(Garrett, Ashley)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. New Liberty Hospital Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Smith
Represented By: Nickalaus C. Seacord
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New Liberty Hospital Corporation
Represented By: Ashley N. Garrett
Represented By: Casey O. Housley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New Liberty Hospital District
Represented By: Ashley N. Garrett
Represented By: Casey O. Housley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?