Liu v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Yangjun Liu |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Terri Robinson |
| 4:2024cv00021 |
| January 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Bough |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case electronically transferred to Northern District of Texas. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Melvin, Greg) |
Filing 2
With the consent of the Honorable Brantley Starr, it is hereby ORDERED that this case be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas for all further proceedings. Signed on 1/11/24 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Diefenbach, Tracy)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Terri Robinson, United States Citizenhip and Immigration Services filed by James O. Hacking, III on behalf of Yangjun Liu. Filing fee $405, receipt number AMOWDC-8797379. Service due by 4/9/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hacking, James) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Terri Robinson, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Woods, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
