Hilt v. Clay County Sheriff Dept et al
Plaintiff: Dallas Cody Hilt
Defendant: Clay County Sheriff Dept, Phillips, Teale and S Copp
Case Number: 4:2024cv00025
Filed: January 8, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Roseann A Ketchmark
Referring Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2024 Filing 12 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: This case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's order. Any motion to reopen this case must be filed within a reasonable period of time and must comply with the Court's previous Order. (Willis, Kathy)
March 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDERED that this case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's order. Any motion to reopen this case must be filed within a reasonable period of time and must comply with the Court's previous Order. Signed on 3/4/2024 by District Judge Roseann A Ketchmark. (Willis, Kathy)
February 16, 2024 Filing 10 PLAINTIFF'S STATEMENT seeking punitive damages filed by Dallas Cody Hilt. Dallas Cody Hilt.(Willis, Kathy)
February 13, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDERED that, because Plaintiff has not paid the initial partial filing fee as previously ordered, Plaintiff shall show cause, on or before FEBRUARY 27, 2024, as to why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Orders. Signed on 2/13/2024 by District Judge Roseann A Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
February 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER that Plaintiff's second motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. #7 ) is denied without prejudice for the reasons explained in this Court's January 19, 2024, Order (Doc. 4 ). Additionally, this case is subject to review and possibly pre-service dismissal under 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Signed on 02/06/2024 by District Judge Roseann A Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Sholes, Amber)
January 31, 2024 Filing 7 PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Dallas Cody Hilt. (Willis, Kathy)
January 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Missouri, an initial partial filing fee of $2.93; and (3) Plaintiff's failure to pay the required initial partial filing fee on or before FEBRUARY 9, 2024, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 1/25/2024 by District Judge Roseann A Ketchmark. (Willis, Kathy)
January 25, 2024 Filing 5 INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Dallas Cody Hilt. (Willis, Kathy)
January 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #3 ) is DENIED without prejudice because the record is not sufficiently developed to determine whether appointment of counsel is warranted, and the case is subject to review and possibly pre-service dismissal under 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Plaintiff is advised that "[t]here is no constitutional right to appointed counsel in civil cases." Phillips v. Jasper County Jail, 437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir. 2006). Rather, "[i]n civil rights matters the court may, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, 'request' an attorney to represent a party if, within the court's discretion, the circumstances are such that would properly justify such a request." Mosby v. Mabry, 697 F.2d 213, 214 (8th Cir. 1982).Signed on 1/19/2024 by District Judge Roseann A Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
January 18, 2024 Filing 3 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Dallas Cody Hilt. (Willis, Kathy)
January 8, 2024 Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Dallas Cody Hilt. (Willis, Kathy)
January 8, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Dallas Cody Hilt. (Willis, Kathy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hilt v. Clay County Sheriff Dept et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dallas Cody Hilt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clay County Sheriff Dept
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Teale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S Copp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?