Bride v. Goodleap, LLC
| Venetia Bride |
| Goodleap, LLC |
| 4:2024cv00054 |
| January 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Roseann A Ketchmark |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
RULE 16 NOTICE. Rule 26 conference due by 3/31/2024. Proposed scheduling order due by 4/14/2024. Signed on March 1, 2024 by District Judge Roseann A Ketchmark. (Wheeler, LaTandra)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 what the Court construes as a joint motion for extension of time to file answer/responsive pleading. Defendant's answer/responsive pleading is due 3/25/2024. Signed on 3/1/2024 by District Judge Roseann A Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Brown, Jonathan)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT by Goodleap, LLC. (Boyd, Thomas) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of appearance by Thomas Boyd on behalf of Goodleap, LLC (Attorney Thomas Boyd added to party Goodleap, LLC(pty:dft))(Boyd, Thomas) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 which the Court construes as a motion for extension of time to answer/respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Defendant Goodleap, LLC's answer or responsive pleading is due 3/4/2024. Signed on 2/14/2024 by District Judge Roseann A Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Brown, Jonathan)
|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD by Goodleap, LLC. (Lytle, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Venetia Bride. Goodleap, LLC served on 1/25/2024, answer due 2/15/2024. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Robertson, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to outside neutral category II. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Goodleap, LLC filed by Alan J. Stecklein on behalf of Venetia Bride. Filing fee $405, receipt number AMOWDC-8818281. Service due by 4/22/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Stecklein, Alan) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Goodleap, LLC. (Woods, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bride v. Goodleap, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Venetia Bride | |
| Represented By: | Alan J. Stecklein |
| Represented By: | Matthew S. Robertson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Goodleap, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Boyd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
