Key v. Higgs et al
Kenneth David Key |
Scott Higgs and All Around Truck, Inc. |
4:2024cv00065 |
January 26, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Brian C Wimes |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 RETURN OF WAIVER OF SERVICE filed by Kenneth David Key. Waiver sent to Scott Higgs on 2/19/2024, answer due 4/19/2024. (Tormohlen, Robert) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to Program Director. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to All Around Truck, Inc., Scott Higgs. (Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Robert W Tormohlen on behalf of Kenneth David Key. Filing fee $405, receipt number AMOWDC-8829453. Service due by 4/25/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Tormohlen, Robert) (Main Document 1 replaced on 1/26/2024) (Woods, Gloria). (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/26/2024: #4 Civil Cover Sheet) Separated Civil Cover Sheet from Complaint - added individually. (Woods, Gloria). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.