Newman v. Thompson
Nicholas Newman |
Liz Thompson |
4:2024cv00142 |
February 20, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Fernando J Gaitan |
Prisoner Pro Se |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MAIL RETURNED as undeliverable, marked INMATE NO LONGER AT THIS FACILITY. Mail sent to Nicholas Newman. (Related documentsL #6 , #7 ) (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: This case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's order. Any motion to reopen this case must be filed within a reasonable period of time and must comply with the Court's previous Order. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 6 ORDERED that this case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's order. Any motion to reopen this case must be filed within a reasonable period of time and must comply with the Court's previous Order. Signed on April 2, 2024 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 5 ORDER that Plaintiff provide an updated address on or before March 29, 2024, or this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed on 3/15/2024 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy) |
MAIL RETURNED as undeliverable, marked REFUSED/RETURN TO SENDER/INMATE NO LONGER AT THIS FACILITY. Mail sent to Nicholas Newman. (Related document 4 ) (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 4 ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #3 ) is DENIED without prejudice because the record is not sufficiently developed to determine whether appointment of counsel is warranted and the case is subject to review and possibly pre-service dismissal under 28 U.S.C. 1915A. See Phillips v. Jasper County Jail, 437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir. 2006) (citing Edington v. Missouri Dept of Corr., 52 F.3d 777, 780 (8th Cir. 1995) ([T]here is no constitutional right to appointed counsel in civil cases.)). Signed on 3/1/2024 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 3 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Nicholas Newman. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Nicholas Newman. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Nicholas Newman. (Willis, Kathy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Newman v. Thompson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Nicholas Newman | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Liz Thompson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.