Cheatom v. Rockwell Security, LLC et al
Davionne Cheatom |
Rockwell Security, LLC, Cydni (LNU) and Ulta Salon Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. |
4:2024cv00278 |
April 17, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Roseann A Ketchmark |
Civil Rights: Accomodations |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint on behalf of Rockwell Security, LLC.(Haddad, Mark) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to outside neutral category I. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of appearance by Mark Haddad on behalf of Rockwell Security, LLC (Attorney Mark Haddad added to party Rockwell Security, LLC(pty:dft))(Haddad, Mark) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of appearance by Michael L. Blumenthal on behalf of Rockwell Security, LLC (Blumenthal, Michael) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Michael L. Blumenthal on behalf of Defendant Rockwell Security, LLC.(Blumenthal, Michael) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jackson County, case number 2416-CV06575, Filing fee $405, receipt number AMOWDC-8965476. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Blumenthal, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.