Letterman et al v. Burgess et al
Jimmy Lee Letterman and Annette Fay Letterman |
William D Burgess, III, George Lombardi and Jon Does 1-10 |
5:2012cv06136 |
November 21, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
St. Joseph Office |
Buchanan |
Nanette K. Laughrey |
Other Statutory Actions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 424 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 390 motion for apportionment of the damages awarded following the jury trial in this case. Signed on 5/16/16 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (Matthes, Renea) |
Filing 422 ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. The Court has identified issues not addressed by Plaintiffs in connection with their motion for apportionment, [Doc. 390]. As described in this Order, Plaintiffs Jimmy and Annette Letterman shall file any additional briefing within 20 days of the date of this Order. Further, Danial Letterman's minor child, Caitlyn, shall have 20 days from the date of this Order in which to intervene and be heard on the issues. (Barragan-Scott, Alana) |
Filing 416 ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey, granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs' motion for attorney fees [Doc. 388]. (Barragan-Scott, Alana) |
Filing 408 ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. Defendants Lammers, Gastineau, Farnsworth, and Earls' motion for judgment as a matter of law, or for new trial, Doc. 394 , is denied. (Barragan-Scott, Alana) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.