Grigsby v. AKAL Security, Inc.
Plaintiff: Hilaria Grigsby
Defendant: AKAL Security, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2017cv06048
Filed: April 19, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: St. Joseph Office
County: Platte
Presiding Judge: Greg Kays
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER determining costs. The Court awards Defendant $2,247.95 in costs. Signed on 7/25/18 by Chief District Judge Greg Kays. (Law Clerk)
June 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER granting 40 motion for summary judgment. Signed on 6/21/18 by Chief District Judge Greg Kays. (Strodtman, Tracy)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grigsby v. AKAL Security, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hilaria Grigsby
Represented By: Molly Brown Bartalos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AKAL Security, Inc.
Represented By: Robert A Sheffield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?