Alame v. Mergers Marketing
Plaintiff: Quinton Alame
Defendant: Mergers Marketing
Case Number: 5:2017cv06066
Filed: May 26, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: St. Joseph Office
County: Clinton
Presiding Judge: Brian C. Wimes
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 IT IS ORDERED Plaintiffs Motion to Remand (Doc. #12) is DENIED. Signed on 9/19/17 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Baldwin, Joella)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alame v. Mergers Marketing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quinton Alame
Represented By: Charles Jason Brown
Represented By: Jayson A. Watkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mergers Marketing
Represented By: Todd A. Lubben
Represented By: Derek H. MacKay
Represented By: Steven H Schwartz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?