Lobo et al v. Klopfenstine Construction, Inc.
Plaintiff: Cassandra Lobo and Diogo Fleury Lobo
Defendant: Klopfenstine Construction, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2018cv06133
Filed: September 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Roseann Ketchmark
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting #17 Plaintiff's motion for leave to file first amended complaint. The Court contacted all parties via email, and Defendant indicated it had no opposition to Plaintiff's motion. Signed on 10/26/2018 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Stout, Courtney)
October 26, 2018 Filing 17 MOTION for leave to file First Amended Complaint filed by Austin B Hayden on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/9/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Hayden, Austin)
October 26, 2018 Filing 16 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Counts III, IV, V and VI of Plaintiffs' Petition for Damages and Suggestions in Suport filed by Austin B Hayden on behalf of Plaintiffs Cassandra Lobo, Diogo Fleury Lobo. Reply suggestions due by 11/9/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #5 ) (Hayden, Austin)
October 26, 2018 Filing 15 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #4 MOTION for more definite statement filed by Austin B Hayden on behalf of Plaintiffs Cassandra Lobo, Diogo Fleury Lobo. Reply suggestions due by 11/9/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #4 ) (Hayden, Austin)
October 23, 2018 Filing 14 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #7 MOTION to remand filed by Austin B Hayden on behalf of Plaintiffs Cassandra Lobo, Diogo Fleury Lobo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Related document(s) #7 ) (Hayden, Austin)
October 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 the parties' Joint Motion to Continue Rule 16 Order Deadlines: The Court finds good cause to stay the requirement to submit a joint proposed scheduling order pending a ruling on #7 Plaintiffs' motion to remand. In the event the motion to remand is denied, the parties' joint proposed scheduling order will be due 14 days after the Court's ruling on the motion to remand. Signed on 10/11/2018 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Phillips, Caleb)
October 10, 2018 Filing 12 Joint MOTION to continue Rule 16 Order Deadlines filed by Austin B Hayden on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/24/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Hayden, Austin)
October 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting in part and denying in part #8 Plaintiffs' motion for a stay or an enlargement of time. In particular, the request for a stay is DENIED, and the request for a 30-day enlargement of time to respond to Defendant's motions is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall respond to Defendant's motions #4 for a more definite statement and #5 to dismiss certain counts on or before October 26, 2018. Signed on 10/9/2018 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Phillips, Caleb) Modified on 10/9/2018. (Phillips, Caleb)
October 9, 2018 Filing 10 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #8 MOTION to stay re #4 MOTION for more definite statement , #3 Rule 16 Notice, #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Counts III, IV, V and VI of Plaintiffs' Petition for Damages and Suggestions in Suport filed by Michael Barzee on behalf of Defendant Klopfenstine Construction, Inc.. Reply suggestions due by 10/23/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #8 ) (Barzee, Michael)
October 9, 2018 Filing 9 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #7 MOTION to remand filed by Michael Barzee on behalf of Defendant Klopfenstine Construction, Inc.. Reply suggestions due by 10/23/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Related document(s) #7 ) (Barzee, Michael)
September 24, 2018 Filing 8 MOTION to stay re #4 MOTION for more definite statement , #3 Rule 16 Notice, #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Counts III, IV, V and VI of Plaintiffs' Petition for Damages and Suggestions in Suport filed by Austin B Hayden on behalf of Cassandra Lobo, Diogo Fleury Lobo. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/9/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #4 , #3 , #5 ) (Hayden, Austin)
September 24, 2018 Filing 7 MOTION to remand filed by Austin B Hayden on behalf of Cassandra Lobo, Diogo Fleury Lobo. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/9/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Hayden, Austin)
September 12, 2018 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand on behalf of Klopfenstine Construction, Inc..(Barzee, Michael)
September 12, 2018 Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Counts III, IV, V and VI of Plaintiffs' Petition for Damages and Suggestions in Suport filed by Michael Barzee on behalf of Klopfenstine Construction, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/26/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Barzee, Michael)
September 12, 2018 Filing 4 MOTION for more definite statement filed by Michael Barzee on behalf of Klopfenstine Construction, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/26/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Barzee, Michael)
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RULE 16 NOTICE. Rule 26 conference due by 10/6/2018. Proposed scheduling order due by 10/20/2018. Signed on 9/6/2018 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Phillips, Caleb)
September 5, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to Program Director. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria)
September 5, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Platte County, Missouri County, case number 18AE-CC00269, filed by Richard F. Lombardo on behalf of Klopfenstine Construction, Inc.. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMOWDC-5923814. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lombardo, Richard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lobo et al v. Klopfenstine Construction, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cassandra Lobo
Represented By: Austin B Hayden
Represented By: Gregory James Pappas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diogo Fleury Lobo
Represented By: Austin B Hayden
Represented By: Gregory James Pappas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Klopfenstine Construction, Inc.
Represented By: Michael Barzee
Represented By: Richard F. Lombardo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?