Black v. Results Companies
Plaintiff: Lorraine D. Black
Defendant: Results Companies
Case Number: 5:2018cv06151
Filed: October 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Ortrie D Smith
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 451
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2018 Set/Reset Deadlines as to #16 MOTION for summary judgment. Reply suggestions due by 12/31/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Houston, Kiambu)
December 10, 2018 Filing 16 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #10 MOTION to dismiss case Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim(s) Under the Missouri Human Rights Act AND Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Lorraine D. Black. Reply suggestions due by 12/24/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(Related document(s) #10 ) (Houston, Kiambu) Modified on 12/11/2018 to reflect as motion for summary judgment (Houston, Kiambu).
December 10, 2018 **DISREGARD** A corrected entry has been filed - Set/Reset Deadlines as to #16 MOTION for summary judgment. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/24/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Houston, Kiambu) Modified on 12/12/2018 (Houston, Kiambu).
December 4, 2018 Filing 15 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Summons and Complaint by mail filed by Results Companies. (Houston, Kiambu)
November 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 RULE 502(d) ORDER - Signed on 11/29/18 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (O'Connor, Stacy)
November 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 RULE 16 NOTICE - Rule 26 conference due by 1/14/2019. Proposed scheduling order due by 1/28/2019. Signed on 11/29/18 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (O'Connor, Stacy)
November 29, 2018 Filing 12 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by T. Christopher Bailey on behalf of Defendant Results Companies.(Bailey, T.)
November 29, 2018 Filing 11 SUGGESTIONS in support re #10 MOTION to dismiss case Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim(s) Under the Missouri Human Rights Act filed by T. Christopher Bailey on behalf of Defendant Results Companies. (Related document(s) #10 ) (Bailey, T.)
November 29, 2018 Filing 10 MOTION to dismiss case Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim(s) Under the Missouri Human Rights Act filed by T. Christopher Bailey on behalf of Results Companies. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/13/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Bailey, T.)
November 29, 2018 Filing 9 ANSWER to #5 Complaint Defendant The Results Companies, LLC's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint on behalf of Results Companies.(Bailey, T.)
November 29, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of appearance by Lauren B. Harris on behalf of Results Companies (Attorney Lauren B. Harris added to party Results Companies(pty:dft))(Harris, Lauren)
November 29, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of appearance by T. Christopher Bailey on behalf of Results Companies (Attorney T. Christopher Bailey added to party Results Companies(pty:dft))(Bailey, T.)
November 8, 2018 Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Lorraine D. Black. Results Companies served on 11/6/2018, answer due 11/27/2018. (Travis, Kendra)
October 25, 2018 ***Remark: Copy of complaint, certified copy of order (Doc. 4) and all service forms hand-delivered to USMS. (Melvin, Greg)
October 18, 2018 Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Results Companies Lorraine D. Black Filing fee $0.00. Service due by 1/16/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Melvin, Greg)
October 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ACTION WITHOUT PAYMENT OF FEES, AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, #1 and #2 . Signed on 10/18/18 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Order mailed to Plaintiff.) (Matthes Mitra, Renea)
October 18, 2018 ***Remark: A copy of Doc. 4 (order) and all service forms were mailed to Lorraine D. Black, 8422 N. Beaman Ave., Kansas City, MO 64154 on 10/18/2018. (Melvin, Greg)
October 16, 2018 Filing 3 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Lorraine D. Black. (Woods, Gloria)
October 16, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION to appoint counsel filed by Lorraine D. Black. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/30/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Woods, Gloria)
October 16, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Lorraine D. Black. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/30/2018 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 1)(Woods, Gloria)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Black v. Results Companies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Results Companies
Represented By: T. Christopher Bailey
Represented By: Lauren B. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lorraine D. Black
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?