Rayford v. Main Event Entertainment, LP
Plaintiff: Tilisa Rayford
Defendant: Main Event Entertainment, LP
Case Number: 5:2019cv06071
Filed: May 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Stephen R Bough
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 17, 2019 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES filed by Sara Katherine McCallum on behalf of Defendant Main Event Entertainment, LP.(McCallum, Sara)
July 12, 2019 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURES filed by Megan Lowe Stiles on behalf of Plaintiff Tilisa Rayford.(Stiles, Megan)
June 28, 2019 Filing 7 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Sara Katherine McCallum on behalf of Defendant Main Event Entertainment, LP.(McCallum, Sara)
June 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 7/26/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 8/5/2019 11:00 AM in Courtroom 7B, Kansas City (SRB) before District Judge Stephen R. Bough. Signed on 6/10/19 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Diefenbach, Tracy)
June 7, 2019 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint on behalf of Main Event Entertainment, LP.(McCallum, Sara)
May 31, 2019 Filing 4 Before this Court is Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (Doc. #3). For good cause stated the motion is granted. Defendant is granted an extension of time until and including June 7, 2019, to file its answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Signed on 5/31/19 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Diefenbach, Tracy)
May 30, 2019 Filing 3 Consent MOTION for extension of time to file answer filed by Sara Katherine McCallum on behalf of Main Event Entertainment, LP. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/13/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (McCallum, Sara)
May 28, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to Program Director. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria)
May 24, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Platte County, case number 19AE-CC00134, filed by Sara Katherine McCallum on behalf of Main Event Entertainment, LP. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMOWDC-6328834. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(McCallum, Sara)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rayford v. Main Event Entertainment, LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tilisa Rayford
Represented By: Megan Lowe Stiles
Represented By: Marc N. Middleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Main Event Entertainment, LP
Represented By: Sara Katherine McCallum
Represented By: Anthony J. Romano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?