Nelson v. Corizon LLC
Ashley D Nelson |
Corizon LLC |
5:2020cv06186 |
December 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Fernando J Gaitan |
Prisoner Pro Se |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT as directed by 1/28/21 order (Doc. #8 ) filed by Ashley D Nelson.(Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 8 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) the agency having custody of Plaintiff will be required to forward to the Clerk of the Court monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's inmate account each time the amount in that account exceeds $10 until the balance of the $350 filing fee is paid; (3) the Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff another set of civil rights forms for her use in filing an amended complaint; (4) Plaintiff is directed to file a single amended complaint as specifically discussed herein; and (5) Plaintiff's failure to amend the complaint as directed, on or before February 11, 2021, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 1/28/2021 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (CLERK'S NOTE: Collect filing fee letter mailed to MO DOC Finance Office with copy of 1/28/2021 Order as directed. Set of civil rights forms sent to Plaintiff along with a copy of this Order as directed.) (Willis, Kathy) |
RECEIPT number KCMO088195 in the amount of $69.46 issued to Ashley D Nelson. (Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 7 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Missouri, Western Division, an initial partial filing fee of $69.46; and (3) Plaintiff's failure to pay the required initial partial filing fee on or before January 19, 2021, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 1/5/2021 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 6 INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Ashley D Nelson. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 5 ORDER that Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. #3 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Signed on 1/4/2021 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 3 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Ashley D Nelson. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/13/2021. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Ashley D Nelson. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Corizon LLC filed by Ashley D Nelson. (Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Nelson v. Corizon LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ashley D Nelson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Corizon LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.