Henderson v. Saul
Jeffrey Henderson |
Andrew M. Saul |
5:2021cv06060 |
May 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Greg Kays |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
RECEIPT number KCMO090880 in the amount of $200.00 issued to Kyle Henry Sciolaro. (Ellis, Lindsey) |
Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE of Social Security complaint. United States Attorney General served on 6/22/2021. (Driskill, Roger) |
Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE of Social Security complaint. Commissioner of Social Security, Office of the Regional Counsel served on 6/17/2021. (Driskill, Roger) |
Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE of Social Security complaint on United States Attorney. Summons served on 6/21/2021 Social security answer due by 8/20/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. Record of Submission due by 9/20/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Driskill, Roger) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 5 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT filed by Roger M. Driskill on behalf of Jeffrey Henderson. (Filing fee $402 receipt number $200filingfee) filed byRoger M. Driskill on behalf of Jeffrey Henderson. Service due by 9/9/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Driskill, Roger) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 in part motion to amend/correct. Plaintiff shall be allowed to proceed by paying a reduced filing fee of $200 within sixty days. Signed on June 9, 2021, by District Judge Greg Kays. (Law clerk) (Main Document 4 replaced on 6/10/2021) (Lehr, Jonathan). |
Filing 3 MOTION to amend/correct filed by Roger M. Driskill on behalf of Jeffrey Henderson. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/22/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Amended Affidavit, #2 IFP application, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Complaianat)(Driskill, Roger) |
Filing 2 ORDER denying #1 without prejudice motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed on June 3, 2021, by District Judge Greg Kays. (Law clerk) |
Filing 1 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Roger M. Driskill on behalf of Jeffrey Henderson. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/4/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Attorney Roger M. Driskill added to party Jeffrey Henderson(pty:pla))(Driskill, Roger) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Henderson v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Henderson | |
Represented By: | Andrea McGrath Wehner |
Represented By: | Roger M. Driskill |
Represented By: | Kyle Henry Sciolaro |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul | |
Represented By: | OGCSSAR7 |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.