Kamp v. Western Missouri Correctional Center
| Benjamin A Kamp, II |
| Western Missouri Correctional Center, Paul Drake, Christopher Brewer, Kimbrough, Cameron Venture, Carr, Mick, Foster, T Gardner and Missouri Department of Corrections |
| 5:2021cv06074 |
| June 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Howard F Sachs |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of appearance by Christopher J. White on behalf of Mick (Attorney Christopher J. White added to party Mick(pty:dft))(White, Christopher) |
Filing 10
ORDER: Plaintiff has filed what the Court construes to be a motion for appointed counsel (Doc. 9). Defendant shall address this motion by September 2, 2021. Signed on August by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (McCoy, Mike)
|
| Filing 9 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Benjamin A Kamp, II. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/26/2021. (Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) all Defendants, except for Mr. Mick, are dismissed as parties in this case; (2) the Missouri Attorney General notify the Court, within 30 days from the date of this Order, whether he will waive service of process as to Defendant Mick; and (3) Defendant Mick answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's amended complaint within 60 days from the date of this Order if service of process is waived, or within 21 days after service of process if service of process is not waived. Signed on July 30, 2021 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 7 PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT as directed by 7/12/21 order (Doc. #6 ) filed by Benjamin A Kamp, II. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: ORDERED that the agency having custody of Plaintiff forward to the Clerk of the Court monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid; (2) the Clerk of the Court send Plaintiff a court-approved 1983 complaint form; and (3) using that form, and following all instructions on that form, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint as instructed herein by July 30, 2021. Signed on 7/12/2021 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. (CLERK'S NOTE: Court-approved forms along with this Order mailed to Plaintiff as directed. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| RECEIPT number KCMO090862 in the amount of $108.27 issued to Benjamin Kamp. (Crocker, Susan) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Missouri, Western Division, an initial partial filing fee of $108.27; and (3) Plaintiff's failure to pay the required initial partial filing fee on or before July 15, 2021, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on July 1, 2021 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 4 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Benjamin A Kamp, II. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Benjamin A Kamp, II. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Western Missouri Correctional Center filed by Benjamin A Kamp, II. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
