Gassel v. Caldwell County Detention Center
| Christopher L Gassel |
| Caldwell County Detention Center Staff |
| 5:2021cv06108 |
| September 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Greg Kays |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER that Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file his amended complaint and pay the initial partial filing fee (Doc. #5 ) is granted, in that Plaintiff shall file his superseding amended complaint and pay the initial partial filing fee on or before November 23, 2021, or face dismissal of this case without further notice. No further extensions of this deadline will be granted absent a clear demonstration of extraordinary circumstances. Signed on 11/1/2021 by District Judge Greg Kays. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 5 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for extension of time to amend and pay the initial partial filing fee and NOTICE of change of address filed by Christopher L Gassel. New address is FCI Terre Haute, PO Box 33, Terre Haute, IN 47808.Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/15/2021. (CLERK'S NOTE: Copy of Doc. #4 order along with civil rights form and docket sheet mailed to plaintiff to new address.)(Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Missouri, Western Division, an initial partial filing fee of $25.50; (3) the Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff another set of civil rights forms for his use in filing an amended complaint; (4) Plaintiff is directed to file a single superseding amended complaint, as specifically discussed herein; and (5) Plaintiff's failure to both pay the required initial partial filing fee and amend as directed, on or before November 2, 2021 will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 10/12/2021 by District Judge Greg Kays. (CLERK'S NOTE: A set of civil rights forms and a copy of this Order mailed to Plaintiff as directed.) (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 3 INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Christopher L Gassel. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Christopher L Gassel. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Christopher L Gassel. (Willis, Kathy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gassel v. Caldwell County Detention Center | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christopher L Gassel | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Caldwell County Detention Center Staff | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
